Please, he let his contract run down and was going to leave for free. Let him leave my ar$e. We should him 2 and bought him back for 4. He did us over. The club offered Pienaar a contract which he turned down for more money knowing he was on a position of strength. Our hand was forced.
As i understand it you're wrong. Pienaar wanted a considerable pay rise which he totally deserved based on the fact that he was one of if not the most influential player for us at that time. The club wouldn't play ball, so he left.
But the contract negotiations aren't even the most important thing. Lescott's performance at Arsenal is.
And yeah, he was going to leave for free, which he's totally within his rights to do. He signed a contract, anything after that is fair game. Lescott signed a contract and then acted like a knob, handed in a transfer request and capitulated when the City interest materialised.
How you can't see the difference there is beyond me tbh.