Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
B
Big Fat Sam
Guest
bluemantis
Previously banned user
You know what I belive you.
I was just thinking I remember sheedy saying that Moyes had made jelavic his number one target just after new years and we didn't get him till the last day of the transfer window...don't know why but that has just popped into my head.
mythbuster
Player Valuation: £35m
@GraemeS1980 Shared some other info earlier in the summer. Can't remember what it was though. Did it come true?
bluemantis
Previously banned user
What being publicly embarrass by "broken leg" Dave? Yeah he did us proud. Face it if everyone hadn't of rejected man u they wouldnt of got felliani and we couldn't of got macarthy but we would of been stuck with a player who didn't suit martinez 's style and we wouldn't of been able to get 10 mil for this transfer window.
I truly belive we got lucky last season. Am not saying kenwright didn't get a good deal for felliani because that's the one thing he's best at but it's not like he had it all planed.
Yeah I guessed it would be for the kits mate.
I didn't actually think they were going to unveil 3 players in the middle of Liverpool town centre like.
Jags..class
Player Valuation: £70m
We didn't get embarrass by Dave, Bill played Man u and Moyes , and got over the odds.
mythbuster
Player Valuation: £35m
Yep, he gave us a jarg 'sneak preview' of our home kit on page 57 of the Umbro thread, ffs.
bizzaro
LOVE GOT JUST THE WAY IT IS #ALWNV
Its not at all. Its based on what Chelsea say in the introduction to their official accounts.
Its also based on what UEFA and the European Commission have said and follow ups to what is happening with Manchester City.
Chelsea are still under investigation for 16million of the revenue they declared.
Also you talk about amortisation. That as you say depends on the length of the contracts but given the huge deficit Chelsea had and the 16 million still under consideration by UEFA they passed FPP on annex XI trend only. Wages going down. Given Chelsea still pay a significant proportion of all the wages for loan players and given they've gone about making signings like they have and changing managers like they have its clear they got through by the skin of their teeth only.
So in basic terms you are wrong and I am right.
Foot Long Hot Dog
Player Valuation: A packet of pork scratchings
Chelsea aren't still under investigation for anything relating to FFP and they weren't one of the 76 clubs who came under scrutiny from UEFA, so yet again you're completely wrong. At least you're consistent
bizzaro
LOVE GOT JUST THE WAY IT IS #ALWNV
WRONG
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...er-City-and-Premier-League-clubs-compare.html
15 Apr 2014
Chelsea
2011/12: £1.4m profit
2012/13: £49.4m loss
Chelsea are not one of the "fewer than 20" clubs being formally investigated by Uefa over possible FFP breaches. However, Telegraph Sport learnt last month that the club could be investigated to verify their claim that more than £16m of their 2012-13 losses were exempt under FFP rules. That may still leave them needing to lose no more than around £4.5m this season to comply with the regulations next year.
Putting your nonsense on ignore. You're boring. As well as wrong.
Your just making things up to suit your argument as opposed to the facts. I love the bit about the European Commission being involved!
As FLHD said Chelsea aren't under any sort of investigation , nor did it get to the stage where they had to claim such exemptions.
Over the two years Chelsea made a net loss of £48 million. From that at least £16 million have been stripped out over the two years in respect of depreciation, another £20 million is in respect of youth development. Take those two sums away and you are already well within the acceptable sums
You say their wages went down. Ironic because in 2012/13 Chelsea's wage bill went up from £173 million to £179 million ! Also amusing because when a player goes on loan the owning club still accounts for all the wages .The loaning club pay a fee which often doesn't cover all the wages but often it includes the amortised costs.
As FLHD said Chelsea aren't under any sort of investigation , nor did it get to the stage where they had to claim such exemptions.
Over the two years Chelsea made a net loss of £48 million. From that at least £16 million have been stripped out over the two years in respect of depreciation, another £20 million is in respect of youth development. Take those two sums away and you are already well within the acceptable sums
You say their wages went down. Ironic because in 2012/13 Chelsea's wage bill went up from £173 million to £179 million ! Also amusing because when a player goes on loan the owning club still accounts for all the wages .The loaning club pay a fee which often doesn't cover all the wages but often it includes the amortised costs.
If this is true and he becomes our marquee signing of the summer - I will be delighted.
I'll be honest with yous....I'm getting pessimistic....god I wish I wouldn't....
Titus Bramble
Best centre half to grace the Premier League
Does anyone know if Chelsea have to sell anyone because of FFP?
- Status