bizzaro
LOVE GOT JUST THE WAY IT IS #ALWNV
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
When they claim something will happen and it doesnt, they claimed Chelsea would be investigated and they werent, you are losing this pretty badly Damo mate.
toffee matt
Player Valuation: £60m
They got £50m for Luis so don't think it's a concern for them
How is the Telegraph a dodgy newspaper????
[/QUOT
Again I will ask where in the article does it say Chelsea are being investigated?
They've already spent it.
No idea if it matters, but if they want to buy more, the Luiz money is gone.
Baines' left foot
Player Valuation: £90m
Is right mate. You tell the ball bags.
WRONG
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...er-City-and-Premier-League-clubs-compare.html
15 Apr 2014
Chelsea
2011/12: £1.4m profit
2012/13: £49.4m loss
Chelsea are not one of the "fewer than 20" clubs being formally investigated by Uefa over possible FFP breaches. However, Telegraph Sport learnt last month that the club could be investigated to verify their claim that more than £16m of their 2012-13 losses were exempt under FFP rules. That may still leave them needing to lose no more than around £4.5m this season to comply with the regulations next year.
Putting your nonsense on ignore. You're boring. As well as wrong.
Bravo, your argument is based on a snipet from the telegraph; not even an article, but a snipet.
You've read the article but forgot to acknowledge the typical media wording (basically a 'we could be wrong so we'll cover our backs' statement); these words include: 'could be', 'claims' and 'may'
bluemangroup
Player Valuation: £70m
It's a shame they're adding nothing of any worth to the debate or enriching any of our lives.
*said with lots of irony*
In their 2014/15 accounts they will show a profit in respect of Luiz of in the region of £30-£40 million. The players they have signed will cost in the region of £15 million. They will have cut massive sums from their wage bill by moving on the likes of Cole, Essien, Ba, Lampard and Eto and also they will no longer be paying De Matteo. Yes they have brought in 3 players who will cost a tidy sum in wages but no where near what they have trimmed also Terry has taken a significant pay cut.
What I am trying to illustrate is that they have boosted income by tens of millions and with the exception of perhaps an additional £10-£20 million in respect of players amortised costs it is highly unlikely following on from selling Mata, De Bryne and now Luiz they will be forced to sale any player they don't want to
What I am trying to illustrate is that they have boosted income by tens of millions and with the exception of perhaps an additional £10-£20 million in respect of players amortised costs it is highly unlikely following on from selling Mata, De Bryne and now Luiz they will be forced to sale any player they don't want to
bizzaro
LOVE GOT JUST THE WAY IT IS #ALWNV
THIS SEASON. Due to Lampard and Cole and others being released.
WRONG.
In the football league its clear that the clubs may divide the wages however they see fit under the: Salary Cost Management Protocol (SCMP)
Its actually defined by loan contract - who pays the wages and gets the national insurance and other tax liabilities.
Thats in accordance with the FIFA Transfer Regulations and UEFA's FFP which is the same as the club licencing defintions.
Go read about it under FFP and club licencing:
Its defined as under Article 49 and 50:
2 Payables are those amounts due to football clubs as a result of transfer
activities, including training compensation and solidarity contributions as defined
in the FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players, as well as any
amount due upon fulfilment of certain conditions.
5 The transfer payables table must contain the following information as a minimum
(in respect of each player transfer, including loans):
e) Other direct costs of acquiring the registration paid and/or payable;
h) Any payable as at 31 March (rolled forward from 31 December) including the
due date for each unpaid element, together with explanatory comment; and
i) Conditional amounts (contingent liabilities) not yet recognised in the balance
sheet as of 31 December.
6 The licence applicant must reconcile the total liability as per the transfer
payables table to the figure in the financial statements balance sheet for
‘Accounts payable relating to player transfers’ (if applicable) or to the underlying
accounting records. The licence applicant is required to report in this table all
payables even if payment has not been requested by the creditor.
and;
Article 50 – No overdue payables towards employees and social/tax
authorities
The licence applicant must prove that as at 31 March preceding the licence
season it has no overdue payables (as defined in Annex VIII) towards its
employees or social and tax authorities as a result of contractual and legal
obligations towards its employees that arose prior to the previous 31 December.
In the FIFA Regulations on Status and Transfers of Players
Article 10 Loan of professionals
1. A professional may be loaned to another club on the basis of a written
agreement between him and the clubs concerned. Any such loan is
subject to the same rules as apply to the transfer of players, including
the provisions on training compensation and the solidarity mechanism.
2. Subject to article 5 paragraph 3, the minimum loan period shall be the
time between two registration periods.
3. The club that has accepted a player on a loan basis is not entitled to
transfer him to a third club without the written authorisation of the
club that released the player on loan and the player concerned.
Good night.
Quality font work
- Status