If whatever manager is eventually appointed keeps us up, then they deserve all the plaudits.
If that's Dyche - then for me considerations as to style and everything that goes with it are secondary. We've lost that argument for the time being and pragmatism trumps everything else. I don't care in the short- to medium- term what tactics are employed to get results.
If we go down, there is the possibility of another managerial change anyway but you'd assume whomever is hired in the next couple of weeks will want to stay on, come what may. We would have to go down fighting as a minimum for that to happen.
I think Dyche is more likely to keep us up and Bielsa more likely to get us up but whether it's either or none of them in the job, it's up to the eventual appointee to make the job his own and try to put his mark on things. For me, they take the job trying their best to keep us up, but accepting the real possibility, some would say likelihood, of failure in that regard.
Bottom line for me is some stability based on results - anything else won't do. I have little to no interest in how we get them, The School of Science shut it's doors a long time ago for it to have any practical meaning. It is welcome to come back when we have the players capable of doing it justice.