It's Sandro syndrome.
I've made no bones about the fact that I'd never seen Kean play before he came, but everyone told me he was amazing, 'one of the best talents in the world' so I was happy with the signing. Same as I was with Sandro. I did say that we might be asking a lot for an untried 19 year old to be our only real improvement in an attacking sense, but I was happy to take it at face value and believe he would be great. When he's played, he hasn't been. Like Sandro. But everyone keeps saying it's just the tactics/manager/other players. Like Sandro.
I'm not saying Kean will be a flop like he was, but all this talk of him being held back and ruined and deserving more chances is exactly what we heard about Sandro. And it was wrong. Very wrong.
If this report is true then the suggestion is that the board (Brands I assume) accepts that actually Kean isn't ready to be our main striker, and we may have expected too much of him. If that's the case, how can we complain about him being on the bench?