catcherintherye
Player Valuation: £80m
he is just looking to index you lol
I don't entirely understand the index thing, but if it's for people who are not ITK (that what it appears) then thats the index I belong on!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80334/803349bc89684f2a3aa0c5d142620c99aeffd692" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
he is just looking to index you lol
Works better than people claiming "we can't LOSE!" when we take all the risk for very little reward.Doesn't really work as a comparison.
Well we can certainly lose yes, but no more so than in most deals. Still, I was more just pointing out that the two things really weren't comparable, just in case you thought they were. If you didn't and were just exaggerating for effect then fair enough, I apologise for being slow.Works better than people claiming "we can't LOSE!" when we take all the risk for very little reward.
The top level Italians don’t leave Italy"rarely"
I never said all.
Its well known.
Only ever seen highlights and celebrations from this fella but out of all the players we’re currently linked with with he’s the one I’m most excited
Mainly cus I think striker is the only position we NEED a signing in, and it would be big if Brands manages to cop a highly rated young player like this from a top 5 club in the world
I guess the question is, between kean and DCL do we get the necessary goals to make the next step as this is why everyone wants a new striker to close the gap until if/when DCL starts slotting more regularly.
The top level Italians don’t leave Italy
Therefore the ones that flip are second tier
But you can't send any signing who flops back, that's the point. It's just one of the risks of signing any player in the world, it's in no way unique to the type of deal we're talking about.
NOt many top onese EVER leave Italy, and the ones that do, dont last long, and go back home.
Yeah I get the argument, and as I said, I agree that it's certainly not ideal. Again though, it's just not right to say there's no upside. If he scores 40 goals in 2 seasons and then we make £10m that's a bloody big upside. It's not as good as him scoring 40 goals and us making a £40m profit no, but it's still good. That's all i'm saying, the deal we're talking about isn't perfect, but it's really not necessarily this absolute disaster that people are painting it as. If he's good for 2 years then he's worth having, if he's not good for 2 years then we'd have lost out anyway regardless of any clauses.But if the player comes good you either a) Get to keep a good player or b) sell for a big profit.
That's the risk reward aspect of buying players. There is none of that in this deal it's all risk for us. If he does well we loose him instantly for less then what he is worth and if he flops we have just blown 30m on a bad player.
If I'm honest though I think this isn't the deal that will end up happening, if it does end up happening.
Can't say I'm overly excited by that video!