I get the impression that you’ve been enjoying the Everton performances a lot more than I have. But for arguments sake..
You can’t just pick and choose which games to count and which to discard. He started the Lincoln game which against lower div opposition should have given him a great chance to showcase his talents. He didn’t take it. He also played 45 against Watford and Leicester. Add the 27 in the horrific derby and that’s 191 mins of mediocrity you’ve discounted because you weren’t sure on who was or wasn’t trying. 191 mins to make a point that he should be starting more games, and he did nothing.
Let’s look at those 20 mins or less games. 14 games he got less than 20 mins (total of 167 mins), what is the point of him even coming on a sub if he can’t impact a game from the bench? Maybe he’s not one of those players hey. 13 games he played more than 20 mins (581 mins). So using your own 20 mins which he must need to warm up, he had 581 mins of time on the pitch in which he should have impacted the game in some way. That’s more than enough time to make an impression, to show a glimpse of talent. Football is a tough profession, if you don’t perform you don’t get given chances, it really is that simple. You have to take the chance when you get it, and he hasn’t.
You think he has ‘everything’ bar consistent hold up play and actually putting chances away? So what does he have that a striker needs? Lukaku didn’t have great hold up play granted, but he was a goal machine, he took his chances at every club he was at til he was a household name. In that sense you can’t compare the two. If Kean was hitting Lukaku’s goals tally then I don’t think anyone would be doubting him. I personally think that Lukaku was an early developer physically and that’s why he never worked on his hold up game, cos he could bully people out of the way and just run through and score. So by the time he came up against players as big as him, it’s a lot more difficult at that age to work on that if it’s never been a part of your game. I wonder if Kean has been similar, an early developer which has got him this far, but now players are as physical and more tactically minded, he’s found wanting because he doesn’t have anything else to his game.
I’ve seen people suggest he play wide cos he’s not very good central, and they’re hoping cos it’s a bit easier out wide, he may get more game time and show something. Fingers crossed but again, I’d be surprised. He’s had chances in games where he’s had the ball with loads of space to run in to, and he’s looked clumsy at best. Perhaps he has some sort of mental issue and with being in a new environment he’s bereft of any confidence, hence why he looks so awkward. One can hope, I guess.
You’re just expecting he’ll get better at finishing, what is that based on? Granted as a team we don’t create many chances, but even ones he has, he doesn’t look even close to being a finisher. The pea rollers from outside the box are lazy efforts which very rarely go in. The ‘assist’ that you give him at Watford was a chance which he scuffed completely, a proper finisher would have at least kicked that towards the goal. That’s possibly the only time I’ve seen him in a position where he looked like he might actually do something. Most of the time he’s nowhere to be seen. The Kean isn’t very good isn’t a campaign, every Everton fan will want him to do well, he’s just not showed even the slightest hint of talent to suggest that he will be a success though and that’s why people are starting to suggest he isn’t very good.