I don't mean this to be offensive to anyone in the UK, but I've found your media are a lot more loose with reporting than US media.
oh your not being mate atall.
just to me and others now it’s all been a load of everton ( bird sheet )
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't mean this to be offensive to anyone in the UK, but I've found your media are a lot more loose with reporting than US media.
What's become clear this week is that we have a third party lender agreement that is allowing that third party to make decisions regarding what lending and equity options we can pursue. That sounds very close to a directorship relationship and exactly what parliament was interested in getting to the bottom of.
So MSPs offer to loan £100m rather than buy a share of the club for £250m presumably complies with the R&M "rules". Is this good news?All loans have rules to follow. Without actually seeing them, we can't tell if they are any more or less reasonable.
That doesn't mean that they control Everton per se. But if those rules are broken, EFC is in default and the loan can become payable, just like any other loan.
So MSPs offer to loan £100m rather than buy a share of the club for £250m presumably complies with the R&M "rules". Is this good news?
Forgive my ignorance here but I am not as clued up as others on here concerning this. How can Myers Tweet that there are two other interested parties when it was only announced yesterday that MSP pulled out. Didn't they have an Exclusivity Agreement whilst completing "Due Dilligence ?"
Exclusivity expired at least a month ago.Forgive my ignorance here but I am not as clued up as others on here concerning this. How can Myers Tweet that there are two other interested parties when it was only announced yesterday that MSP pulled out. Didn't they have an Exclusivity Agreement whilst completing "Due Dilligence ?"
I thought Moshiri hoovered up the clubs debts in the few years of ownership? This R&M thing pre dates him, or has Bill done sommet off his own bat since?
Think people are miss understanding what’s going on.
MSP wanted 25% stake for 100 mil but where told by Everton I guess, that they will have to repay the R&M funding loan, an they refused
R&M dispute being extremely dodgy didn’t say NO you can’t buy Everton unless you pay us
Or RM insurance is on Moshiri shares and him diluting his shares makes them worth less, whole things mad unless Moshiri agreed a full takeover with someone elseNo one truly knows, but the first part doesn't stand to reason. Are you saying that they would put in 100 million and then be obligated to pay off the 200 million of RM funding?
Or that the 100 million would go to paying off part of the RM funding?
Neither makes much sense.
They need 100 million to help finish the stadium and got it.
There are a few reasons why RM might object. Obvious ones are that 1. MSP wanted interest (and then dividends) paid in cash instead of accrued interest; 2. with the MSP debt (which is what it was, convertible later), the club would be leveraged beyond the original parameters and RM wanted MSP or Moshiri to get the ratio back in line.
Given what's just happened with the MSP deal falling apart as a result of one of these stipulations in the loan you have to question how wise it was to agree to such a contract.All loans have rules to follow. Without actually seeing them, we can't tell if they are any more or less reasonable.
That doesn't mean that they control Everton per se. But if those rules are broken, EFC is in default and the loan can become payable, just like any other loan.
Or RM insurance is on Moshiri shares and him diluting his shares makes them worth less, whole things mad unless Moshiri agreed a full takeover with someone else