welshtoffee
Player Valuation: £25m
Thoroughly deserved as wellDave getting splatted all over the spot here like a cheap hooker.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thoroughly deserved as wellDave getting splatted all over the spot here like a cheap hooker.
lol
Heat map off 6 sub appearances.
Almost too hilarious.
Played 14 times that season.lol
Heat map off 6 sub appearances.
Almost too hilarious.
I think what we've really seen in the thread is an acknowledgement (at last) that Patterson has to be played high up the pitch to get anything out of him and hand him no defensive duties in doing that, and that if we play him we have to avoid playing a back four.
That's at least progress.
When, even in his peak has Coleman been effective as a wingback for a sustained period?I dont think that's remotley happened, do you?
More substantially: the positioning on the pitch of Patterson is much more advanced than a normal WB will play. He's basically crowding out Gordon. That represents a problem as to where to deploy Gordon if he continues this (Lampard) into the PL season.
This is why Coleman will continually be preferred, as he makes matters much more simple for Lampard. Seamus can play in a back three as a RWB who overlaps Gordon when he can, but doesn't crowd him out; and he also slots into a back four too.
Nobody but you is saying that.I think what we've really seen in the thread is an acknowledgement (at last) that Patterson has to be played high up the pitch to get anything out of him and hand him no defensive duties in doing that, and that if we play him we have to avoid playing a back four.
That's at least progress.
Coleman has been our most consistently good player for the last generation.When, even in his peak has Coleman been effective as a wingback for a sustained period?
Go and have a read of the thread post-Minnesota United result.Nobody but you is saying that.
Yeah, that was then, this is now.Go and have a read of the thread post-Minnesota United result.
I'll refer you to the previous question, when has Coleman been effective as a wing back for a sustained period?Coleman has been our most consistently good player for the last generation.
I don't think we have the team capability to play attacking fullbacks in a back 4.I think what we've really seen in the thread is an acknowledgement (at last) that Patterson has to be played high up the pitch to get anything out of him and hand him no defensive duties in doing that, and that if we play him we have to avoid playing a back four.
That's at least progress.
Or in the team instructions, he's told to play more defensively which he can do, or we play a DM who can drop back to become a third CB if required when defending. Nothing is as linear as you're trying to make it and we don't look like playing 4 at the back anytime soon anyway.That's simply turned around by saying that we cant play 4 at the back if Patterson is in the team.