Dave in 3 sec: BUT HE DIDN'T ATTACK HE WAS SUPPOSED TO ATTACK lolDave he had a very good game v a top player - end of just shut up.....it's a pathetic attack on a fullback who defended well...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dave in 3 sec: BUT HE DIDN'T ATTACK HE WAS SUPPOSED TO ATTACK lolDave he had a very good game v a top player - end of just shut up.....it's a pathetic attack on a fullback who defended well...
Sorry mate, but you came into this conversation half-way through. My point was to agree with another poster that Coleman was better to have in that period of the game he came on than Patterson.Dave he had a very good game v a top player - end of just shut up.....it's a pathetic attack on a fullback who defended well...just get back in your box FGS ....
The sad sack that is Div probably 'knocked one off' when he saw NP getting subbed for Seamus!He’s quality - the current and long term best option we have at RB.
He played very well today so his detractor should knock it off.
Stop being sensible!He will only get better, has had ups and downs so far but he has room to grow. Saying that I am glad Lampard made the change - Coleman was the right choice at that time today.
He's bungled in order to take a few points away from us, it would have been highly likely that City would have found a way through him in what turned out to be the final 30 minutes of that game. Seamus was excellent.He will only get better, has had ups and downs so far but he has room to grow. Saying that I am glad Lampard made the change - Coleman was the right choice at that time today.
Coleman used his experience for the shot spell of time he is capable for now ......plus Grelish was subbed.....Sorry mate, but you came into this conversation half-way through. My point was to agree with another poster that Coleman was better to have in that period of the game he came on than Patterson.
You're welcome.
Sorry mate, but you came into this conversation half-way through. My point was to agree with another poster that Coleman was better to have in that period of the game he came on than Patterson.
You're welcome.
Yeah...20 minutes after Coleman came on....to be replaced by....Foden.Coleman used his experience for the shot spell of time he is capable for now ......plus Grelish was subbed.....
Where you watch Dave ?
I dont agree with sone of what you say on Patterson (I really like him) but you are spot on here. With him on a booking it was the perfect sub, and Coleman really sured up that side.
Good management from Lampard too, utilising the strengths of each player