The most popular MOTM in the match thread, too.Best player in a blue shirt last night. Telling its the same old posters who are the only ones saying otherwise, like it pains them to give the lad any sort of credit. Very sad individuals.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The most popular MOTM in the match thread, too.Best player in a blue shirt last night. Telling its the same old posters who are the only ones saying otherwise, like it pains them to give the lad any sort of credit. Very sad individuals.
7/10 v the Champions a big differenceYou're using an opinion that 7/10 is one of his best performance from a season where he's played quite a number of matches to defend him from criticism?
Nope I was talking about last night.You're using an opinion that 7/10 is one of his best performance from a season where he's played quite a number of matches to defend him from criticism?
7/10 v the Champions a big difference
In your opinion that's what it's all about even when your outnumbered on this thread ..So he raises his game to a heady 7/10 v City but turns in 6/10 performances against everyone else.
Nope I was talking about last night.
If someone plays badly, they get criticised then fair enough, when someone generally is considered to have played well in a game they would usually get praised imho or that's how it works in my head anyway.
There are some on here who are agenda driven against the lad, you don't seem to be you say so it's just your opinion and that's what's all about, opinions, good or bad. Keeps the forum interesting for sure.
Nope I was talking about last night.
If someone plays badly, they get criticised then fair enough, when someone generally is considered to have played well in a game they would usually get praised imho or that's how it works in my head anyway.
There are some on here who are agenda driven against the lad, you don't seem to be you say so it's just your opinion and that's what's all about, opinions, good or bad. Keeps the forum interesting for sure.
You don't offer opinions on anything other than Nathan Patterson though, those you accuse of agenda driven obsession at least post on other Everton related threads.
Personally I think it's the massive over reaction to the criticism that makes for all the drama on this thread - only on the Nathan Patterson thread stating that he gets caught out of position classed as "hurling bile", only on the Nathan Patterson thread is making an observation that his level of fitness isn't great classed as "spouting vitriol." Nobody who criticises Mykolenko, for example, gets accused of being Russian. This thread is what it is because of people obsessed with defending a player no matter how crap he plays.
He did alright last night in the second half, nothing more, yet the usual are in here on the morale high ground.
You don't offer opinions on anything other than Nathan Patterson though, those you accuse of agenda driven obsession at least post on other Everton related threads.
Personally I think it's the massive over reaction to the criticism that makes for all the drama on this thread - only on the Nathan Patterson thread stating that he gets caught out of position classed as "hurling bile", only on the Nathan Patterson thread is making an observation that his level of fitness isn't great classed as "spouting vitriol." Nobody who criticises Mykolenko, for example, gets accused of being Russian. This thread is what it is because of people obsessed with defending a player no matter how crap he plays.
He did alright last night in the second half, nothing more, yet the usual are in here on the morale high ground.
My mistake for posting in one of the most popular threads pointing out unfairness where I see it.You don't offer opinions on anything other than Nathan Patterson though, those you accuse of agenda driven obsession at least post on other Everton related threads.
Personally I think it's the massive over reaction to the criticism that makes for all the drama on this thread - only on the Nathan Patterson thread stating that he gets caught out of position classed as "hurling bile", only on the Nathan Patterson thread is making an observation that his level of fitness isn't great classed as "spouting vitriol." Nobody who criticises Mykolenko, for example, gets accused of being Russian. This thread is what it is because of people obsessed with defending a player no matter how crap he plays.
He did alright last night in the second half, nothing more, yet the usual are in here on the morale high ground.
I can criticise our other 38 year old right back more easily than Patterson...You're using an opinion that 7/10 is one of his best performance from a season where he's played quite a number of matches to defend him from criticism?
They are just a wum. As evidenced by their first post in here following the game compared to all subsequent posts. Just don’t engage.My mistake for posting in one of the most popular threads pointing out unfairness where I see it.
Had posted in other threads and have done so again
Think you will find quite a lot of people post in here and not others for those same reasons
All through the first half he stayed 5 yds away from Grealish when he had the ball giving him room on the outside. It's just his positioning is so poor.
Why? Cos they have a different view to you. Come on….be betterBest player in a blue shirt last night. Telling its the same old posters who are the only ones saying otherwise, like it pains them to give the lad any sort of credit. Very sad individuals.