The problem he had was when his gimmick got found out he couldn’t work out a way to counteract itOverlapping centre halves are an Achilles heel when you are leaking goals lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The problem he had was when his gimmick got found out he couldn’t work out a way to counteract itOverlapping centre halves are an Achilles heel when you are leaking goals lol
We need both, otherwise we might as well throw the damn towel in. This isn’t 2002 anymore. I’m sick to death of us being ‘just there’We need someone to build then get results. The emphasis has to be on building first.
Swear I saw female Moyes while walking down Shiel Road with my shopping before lolNot all - he had a higher "hotness quotient" in those gender-flipped photos!
View attachment 129610
View attachment 129609
There is a lot in what you say, there are many managers who suit certain clubs and can get success. However the chances of hitting lucky are slim so you go with a manager who has had success at different clubs. If we have money to dip into the transfer market in a significant way are true the we don’t need Moyes’ qualities, we need a winner.I think it just underlines that certain managers and jobs are better suited than others.
Just like Pep would flop at Burnley, or Dyche would be rubbish at City. We need a guy with the sort of qualities Moyes had in his day: hard work, dedication to fitness, an eye on long-term building, tireless scouting to get value for money.
Na I got your point but who's to say Potter will want get rid of the above you mentioned?2 of the above weren't bought and the other 4 where bought by DOFs
Except that's exactly what they do take into account?
I'm honestly baffled by this post
I have always favoured ‘the big name manager to attract better players argument’ but after 18months of Ancelotti who can we say his presence ‘attracted’?Yes we should... No mark managers attract no mark players. Modern game unfortunately.
Also where did Brighton finish and what's he even achieved to warrent a mention?
Typical Yorkshireman - stubborn as a mule. Should have just told them to stick to defending!The problem he had was when his gimmick got found out he couldn’t work out a way to counteract it
Couldn’t agree more, people wanna take 5 years to rebuildWe need both, otherwise we might as well throw the damn towel in. This isn’t 2002 anymore. I’m sick to death of us being ‘just there’
Yeah but you don't build an xG of 5.2 on 5 shots. It would literally take 8 or 9 really big chances, like inside the penalty spot with your strong foot, to get to that.What? No it doesn’t. It’s essentially saying “this is the number of big chances you’re creating” and people are looking at it going “see our xG was 5.2 in that game so technically we should’ve won it 5-1!!!”
I guess that's the thing. The game is a business now. A guy like Shankly would have got turfed out after a season!There is a lot in what you say, there are many managers who suit certain clubs and can get success. However the chances of hitting lucky are slim so you go with a manager who has had success at different clubs. If we have money to dip into the transfer market in a significant way are true the we don’t need Moyes’ qualities, we need a winner.
If we don’t have money but we still don’t need Moyes‘ qualities as one of those qualities is to jump ship when a better offer comes along.
The only reason people want Potter is they look at his XG, and cream their pants. XG does not win you points! His win percentage is 25%, what has this lad done which is so exceptional that he warrants getting the Everton job? He certainly isnt out performing Chris Hughton his predecessor.......
Some need to give their head a wobble!
We need to go for the best out there, nothings guaranteed but the chances of success are alot higher than taking one of the leagues basement boys. Da`s on here saying Moyes has a glass ceiling yet want Potter who has never had even a mid table finish. Cant understand the thought process!
Yeah but you don't build an xG of 5.2 on 5 shots. It would literally take 8 or 9 really big chances, like inside the penalty spot with your strong foot, to get to that.
The hating stats thing makes more sense now I gotta say.
We will always be what we are unless we change the process. A long term plan would be that.We need both, otherwise we might as well throw the damn towel in. This isn’t 2002 anymore. I’m sick to death of us being ‘just there’
You said you don't like xG because it doesn't factor in that strikers miss and that's literally the entire point of it. There is no point in going on here, you've got no clue on this unfortunately.I never said xG was equivalent to the number of shots??? Why are you making things up again like when you said Lookman was a good player?