Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he comes in I will support him and yes it's not easy at Brighton but I just don't see these ifs and buts and in theory, the situation at Everton is totally different as is the pressure and a 25% win record in the premier just doesn't inspire. And makes me concerned we would be in the same position in eighteen months rather like we were with Silva. I think we should appoint someone with at least a bit more of an actual record of more results. I recognise we need a rebuild and more of a coach but what would be building towards with Potter beyond a style of play? I want to see it but I don't yet. I will go away and look into him more, but I feel it's a gamble when there are candidates like Fonseca and Farve out there that have more of a record and can implement a style.Brighton hardly have the best striking options do they?
They created a lot of chances but didn't slot
We have a good striker in DCL
We create the same amount of chances as Bright did but stick a good striker on the end of them then surely that suggests we'll score more goals?
His Brighton side were tight at the back, so if we're tight at the back and scoring goals then we'll win football games and thus have points and thus be in contention for European places
That's just common sense isn't it?
I would still have Lampard. Like the style he would bring. Has gained a few seasons experience to learn from any mistakes and is up and coming. Think Chelsea was just too big and pressurised at the time but didn't do as bad as people make out. Only danger would be if he takes Everton upwards then Chelsea could easily line him up again.
Its you insinuating (without foundation) that he was forced out, along with all other managers since, by the players, that I am objecting to.I'm singing from the same hymn sheet as you: no to Roberto for me.
He gave us a go and couldn't shift the cultural dial of the club back far enough to impose a possession based game on us. And he'd have that problem again.
Some (many or even most) Evertonians seem to want a direct long ball style of play. They rejected the school of science.
And Carlo with his wealth of experience has us in 10th !!!!he spent 200m and had them in 9th
Makes me laugh, you wouldn't dream his successor immediately came in to win the champions league and finish 4th, beating City 3 times in the process. They were tipped for the title before the season startedhe spent 200m and had them in 9th
If he comes in will support him but I just don't see these ifs and buts and in theory, the situation at Everton is totally different as is the pressure and a 25% win record in the premier just doesn't inspire. I think we should appoint someone with at least a bit more of an actual record of more results. I recognise we need a rebuild and more of a coach but what would be building towards with Potter beyond a style of play? I want to see it but I don't. I will go away and look into him more, but I feel it's a gamble when there are candidates like Fonseca and Farve out there that have more of a record and can implement a style.
we’re not getting potter thank god
it won’t be someone from this league
Wasn't that knife to a gun fight in reference to the spending powerWe would have to buy him out of his West Ham contract - never go back, he's like Father Christmas gets the sack a lot .... his record since leaving us is pants he's a failure one good season at West ham no thanks .... Knife to a gunfight attitude remember back .... hoof ball too.....
Rather give big Dunc a go TBH with a good no 2 - Tim Cahill or Lampard.... than him return ......if he does its Blue Bill with our Davey .... far to cosy.....
See!!!! That is an improvement on us.he spent 200m and had them in 9th
I take the point there is no ideal candidate most of them are a gamble on the list. Those are valid criticisms but looking at Fonseca his fast tempo style fits with us and he has a bit more a proven record than Potter looking at his win percentage. Farve has built teams and improved players.. Who do you favour?I wouldn't like either of Fonseca or Favre.
Fonseca was sacked by Roma. They brought him in to essentially do the type of job with Roma he'd be asked to do here only its relatively easier there. He didn't pull up any trees.
Favre for me is the sort of guy who leads a team up the mountain and then right back down again. Everywhere he has been is marked with a great start followed by a sustained slump. He walked out on Moenchengladbach after leading them into the Champions League after a poor start to the following season. That's typical of his career.