Fair points, mate, but let me break it down for you.
First off, the reason Roma is on their third manager this season is because Friedkin Group acts. They’re not the type to sit on their hands when things aren’t working. If a manager isn’t delivering, they’ll pull the trigger rather than dragging out a bad situation. Compare that to how Everton’s board has clung to failing managers in the past. Wouldn’t you rather have owners who make tough calls to fix things rather than stick with someone who’s not up to it?
Now, about Ranieri – yeah, I get what you’re saying, but let’s not lump Friedkin into a lazy “they’ll pick anyone” narrative. They picked Mourinho for Roma, which was a huge statement of intent. The Friedkin Group doesn’t just look at a manager’s name; they consider whether that person fits the club’s needs at the time. Ranieri might have been brought in during tough times to stabilize things temporarily, but that doesn’t mean he’s their blueprint for every job.
If anything, it shows they’re adaptable. Everton needs stability now, but that doesn’t mean they’d settle for a short-term fix like Ranieri. They’ve got the resources and ambition to find someone who fits our specific situation, whether that’s an experienced name or a fresh thinker.
So yeah, maybe Roma’s had a revolving door of managers, but it’s been about finding the right fit. And considering how they’ve progressed in Europe and stayed competitive in Serie A, I’d say they’re doing alright. Friedkin’s not perfect, but they’ve got more vision and decisiveness than what we’ve had running the show at Goodison for years. Surely that’s an upgrade, no?