Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

New Everton Owners: The Friedkin Group

What do we reckon?

  • 👍

    Votes: 853 72.7%
  • 🤷 | 🧀🥪

    Votes: 277 23.6%
  • 👎

    Votes: 43 3.7%

  • Total voters
    1,173
It wasn't there. If it was there would have been no need for Friedkin to provide "operational and stadium" funding

Unless it was in Friedkins interest too, as they could access funding on more favourable terms.

Everton line up funding streams to cover final payments and ongoing operational costs.

TFG come in for purchase of the club and can access better terms for those same final payments and operational costs.

Hey presto, Everton had funding in place & TFG have supplied funding. Both things can be true.
It doesn't take some sort of super brain to see that does it?
 
Unless it was in Friedkins interest too, as they could access funding on more favourable terms.

Everton line up funding streams to cover final payments and ongoing operational costs.

TFG come in for purchase of the club and can access better terms for those same final payments and operational costs.

Hey presto, Everton had funding in place & TFG have supplied funding. Both things can be true.
It doesn't take some sort of super brain to see that does it?

That's not what happened though. They needed an additional £60 million that Freidkin are providing. To complete the stadium

This is additional loans not replacement of current loans. Which won't happen until the club is taken over.
 
It wasn't there. If it was there would have been no need for Friedkin to provide "operational and stadium" funding
The funding could have been there and lined up from another source couldn't it? Friedkin coming in means they've decided to fund it instead rather than going with the outside source.

Say I had credit pre-agreed for a car purchase then the funding is there and available. Then I come into money unexpectedly and decide not to take the credit option. Just because I'm now buying with my own money doesn't mean the funding to purchase wasn't available in the first place.
 

The funding could have been there and lined up from another source couldn't it? Friedkin coming in means they've decided to fund it instead rather than going with the outside source.

Say I had credit pre-agreed for a car purchase then the funding is there and available. Then I come into money unexpectedly and decide not to take the credit option. Just because I'm now buying with my own money doesn't mean the funding to purchase wasn't available in the first place.

It wasn't. I'll avoid repetition because it annoys people. It just wasn't the case. They needed another £60 million to complete the stadium. They got it when TFG agreed to takeover and it's been advanced to the club. Ahead of the takeover

That's me done for the night now.

You lot have fun
 
I can't help it if some people on here don't like to hear the truth 🤷‍♂️

Literally, people were shouting where is the evidence on 24 September 2024. Well it's out there. Published today.

I can't help it if some people on here don't like to hear the truth 🤷‍♂️

Literally, people were shouting where is the evidence on 24 September 2024. Well it's out there. Published today.
 

Attachments

  • 1727821911255.gif
    1727821911255.gif
    2.7 MB · Views: 8
I suggest you give up replying to the bore, no matter you say HE is right and everyone else is wrong. Fighting a losing battle, you could literally show the divvy proof and he would still call you a liar. Life is to short and its weird seeing people reply to him when I have him blocked lol

You quoted Colin Chong's match programme at me on 24 September. It's been proven to be wrong and misleading now
 

That's not what happened though. They needed an additional £60 million that Freidkin are providing. To complete the stadium

This is additional loans not replacement of current loans. Which won't happen until the club is taken over.

But where is the proof of what you are claiming. You have been unable to provide it. Everything that you have quoted can be explained in that small piece of text.

You just keep on repeating yourself ad nauseum without any proof whatsoever. Not a single thing you have shared gives any indication that what you claim happened is the truth. Surely as somebody "in legal" you can understand the optics of that.
 
But where is the proof of what you are claiming. You have been unable to provide it. Everything that you have quoted can be explained in that small piece of text.

You just keep on repeating yourself ad nauseum without any proof whatsoever. Not a single thing you have shared gives any indication that what you claim happened is the truth. Surely as somebody "in legal" you can understand the optics of that.

See the comments from some of the Echo reporters today. Keep denying it then mate.
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top