New Everton Stadium

[mickefc]

Came on, seen 10 unread pages. Thought there must be another exciting little update. No, 10 pages of whether covid restrictions will still be about in 3 years

 

[Dymak]

Chrsit on a bike this is hard work. The current legislation states that all measures willed on 21st June. It would take a new Statutory Instrument to be laid before the HoP to extend it beyond then and there is no political or populous will for that even if things start to go a bit pair shaped. It is the opposite of your argument, rather than a ban on stadium attendance having to be removed, it will have to be re legislated for. Very very different positions. Just give ut up mate, you have got the wrong end of enough of this stick to get the wrong end of a forest.

I think you are misunderstanding my argument. I've simply stated that the legislation, as applied today, would have to change because nobody would be interested in paying for a stadium that nobody would be allowed to attend.

No restrictions, no problem!

So if the plan goes ahead and the restrictions are removed, sound! But if there was a need to make use of that subsection that states the plan can be completely changed should it need to be, then that could be a problem. Hopefully that won't be the case, but I'm clearly not as confident in predicting the future as many other people are.

 

[Dymak]

If the Government banned fans from football, for ever, there would be no fans at any sports, no music gigs, ever, no TV audiences, ever, no theatres, ever also.

There would also be no need for a ground at all.

So no, your premise would not be considered. Cos no money would be needed.

So we are agreed that a continuation of the current outright ban on attending live events would likely put people off investing half a billion pound on a stadium built to host live events?

 

[Jimishorts]

Came on, seen 10 unread pages. Thought there must be another exciting little update.

 

[Goat]

So we are agreed that a continuation of the current outright ban on attending live events would likely put people off investing half a billion pound on a stadium built to host live events?

What the hell.

 

[number4.]

I think you are misunderstanding my argument. I've simply stated that the legislation, as applied today, would have to change because nobody would be interested in paying for a stadium that nobody would be allowed to attend.

No restrictions, no problem!

So if the plan goes ahead and the restrictions are removed, sound! But if there was a need to make use of that subsection that states the plan can be completely changed should it need to be, then that could be a problem. Hopefully that won't be the case, but I'm clearly not as confident in predicting the future as many other people are.

WE ARE NOT PLAYING AT BMD THIS AFTERNOON

 

[BirkenheadBlue]

So we are agreed that a continuation of the current outright ban on attending live events would likely put people off investing half a billion pound on a stadium built to host live events?

Absolutely. But there would need to be some strong indication that such a continuation (to cover a period of over 3 years from now) was actually going to happen, in order for investors to be put off.

There isn't, so they won't be.

 

[rylojr]

Exactly. In that apocalypse scenario, BMD could be used as the North West Thunderdome, Mad Max style, where everyone battles to the death for bog roll and pasta.

TWO MEN ENTER! ONE MAN LEAVES!!!

 

[Mutzo Nutzo]

So we are agreed that a continuation of the current outright ban on attending live events would likely put people off investing half a billion pound on a stadium built to host live events?

 

[Frenk]

I always wanted a cat like that.

 

[Crestfallen]

Breaking news. Someone trying to urinate on new stadium good news. Shock!

 

[Frenk]

Sod that I want this:

 

[roydo]

So we are agreed that a continuation of the current outright ban on attending live events would likely put people off investing half a billion pound on a stadium built to host live events?

No. They wouldnt even consider it as a risk.

If a lender did actually consider it as a risk, they would be the worst property financier on the planet, and has probably never lent a penny.

 

[DanB90]

Hearing this has been put on the back burner because with the rate of increase to obesity we may have to make the seats twice as wide in 10 years time and funding half a billion pounds for a stadium that could only fit 25,000 people just isn’t viable.

 

[MikeH72]

Jesus Christ what is going on in here today.