Dixie D
Player Valuation: £6m
Ok wow!
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BiggyRat
Player Valuation: £35m
Fixed.
Now, to your point. There used to be a stadium down here that was so unloved (too far from the City) that it was abandoned. They decided to convert it to residential but instead of removing it totally, they kept one section, and the pitch itself & built around it. Make of it what you will...
AdamEFC
Player Valuation: £35m
He wasn't to sure, said he would try and find out.
catcherintherye
Player Valuation: £80m
I can't read the entirety of the letter as the formatting is too small. This done not read like a letter a potential investor would write. It looks like what a Kopite thinks a letter of enquiry would sound like. I am amazed they have mentioned the 5 European Cups in the intro. There is no way you would go mentioning price in the opening paragraph. Nor would a deal of hundreds of millions be discussed so brazenly.
Finally in the modern age there is absolutely no way issues of such magnitude are discussed via letter. Not when you have email, and conference call facilities available. (It would not be done by those either, it would be done with face to face meetings with lawyers present). The other point is, if it were genuine there is simply no way that it gets tweeted out without a lot more information being redacted. No company would want that letter public and they would put the legal feelers out to ensure it wasn't published on twitter. There will be all sorts of confidentiality clauses preventing leaking of information in discussions that are actually happening. The fact the tweet hasn't been taken down states to me it's a hoax, as if it were real that would have been removed quite quickly alongside the threat of legal action.
Think about when we were bought over. Even with the Americans who we had good intelligence on (compared to the other extreme of Moshiri who there was very limited intelligence) we knew very little about it and certainly knew nothing about it at the time of the proposal stage. The Liverpool Echo had far less information than this and that was at the closing period. Likewise whoever has given them that letter had it been genuine would have done so on the precaution that it cannot be made public. It is unfathomable that a football podcasting website would have been given access to that level of legitimate information and had it been legitimate would been plastered all over twitter.
That being said, lets take it at face value. It states developing Anfield & building a new ground. That doesn't make sense. FSG have made it clear they want to remain at Anfield and it means the redevelopment place us just pouring money down the drain. It makes it very unlikely.
In the off chance that all of the above information is correct, the new Investors want to waste the redevelopment on Anfield can force FSG to change tact (as they look to want to be minority shareholders) then they face the very real objection that LCC will only want 1 stadium built on the waterfront.
What we know from the Council is that Everton have been in discussions for some time. We are also told on good authority discussions with Everton are quite advanced which goes along with Joe Andersons 3 years stuff. If Everton are designing stadiums and paying for architects (as The Esk suggested) then there is a very real chance Everton will enter a period of exclusivity on the sites. If we haven't already that will follow and is normal protocol. You don't take the time to pay outside agencies to build designs unless you secure exclusivity as they can simply take their ideas elsewhere at the end of the process.
What this may be, is an underhand way to either destabilise that project or a way to curry fervour to the idea of building a joint stadium. Someone from FSG may have been surprised at this and thought "lets plant something which could change the narrative somewhat, we need a few gullible idiots who will carry it though". Step forward ginger nut Hughes and his gang of 40 year old virgins at the Anfield Wrap who will uncritically carry stuff. The Echo would never have ran with it and I suspect they may have tried their first and been told to do one.
All summation of course. What I am certain of is that letter is not genuine. It smacks of a bloke in a bedsit in Manchester!
Finally in the modern age there is absolutely no way issues of such magnitude are discussed via letter. Not when you have email, and conference call facilities available. (It would not be done by those either, it would be done with face to face meetings with lawyers present). The other point is, if it were genuine there is simply no way that it gets tweeted out without a lot more information being redacted. No company would want that letter public and they would put the legal feelers out to ensure it wasn't published on twitter. There will be all sorts of confidentiality clauses preventing leaking of information in discussions that are actually happening. The fact the tweet hasn't been taken down states to me it's a hoax, as if it were real that would have been removed quite quickly alongside the threat of legal action.
Think about when we were bought over. Even with the Americans who we had good intelligence on (compared to the other extreme of Moshiri who there was very limited intelligence) we knew very little about it and certainly knew nothing about it at the time of the proposal stage. The Liverpool Echo had far less information than this and that was at the closing period. Likewise whoever has given them that letter had it been genuine would have done so on the precaution that it cannot be made public. It is unfathomable that a football podcasting website would have been given access to that level of legitimate information and had it been legitimate would been plastered all over twitter.
That being said, lets take it at face value. It states developing Anfield & building a new ground. That doesn't make sense. FSG have made it clear they want to remain at Anfield and it means the redevelopment place us just pouring money down the drain. It makes it very unlikely.
In the off chance that all of the above information is correct, the new Investors want to waste the redevelopment on Anfield can force FSG to change tact (as they look to want to be minority shareholders) then they face the very real objection that LCC will only want 1 stadium built on the waterfront.
What we know from the Council is that Everton have been in discussions for some time. We are also told on good authority discussions with Everton are quite advanced which goes along with Joe Andersons 3 years stuff. If Everton are designing stadiums and paying for architects (as The Esk suggested) then there is a very real chance Everton will enter a period of exclusivity on the sites. If we haven't already that will follow and is normal protocol. You don't take the time to pay outside agencies to build designs unless you secure exclusivity as they can simply take their ideas elsewhere at the end of the process.
What this may be, is an underhand way to either destabilise that project or a way to curry fervour to the idea of building a joint stadium. Someone from FSG may have been surprised at this and thought "lets plant something which could change the narrative somewhat, we need a few gullible idiots who will carry it though". Step forward ginger nut Hughes and his gang of 40 year old virgins at the Anfield Wrap who will uncritically carry stuff. The Echo would never have ran with it and I suspect they may have tried their first and been told to do one.
All summation of course. What I am certain of is that letter is not genuine. It smacks of a bloke in a bedsit in Manchester!
Blue Cheese
Mental Patient, GOT Ward
This is one project in really excited about, a new state of the art stadium would be magnificent
Onwards Evertonians
Player Valuation: £8m
I just pray for the day I wake up to news that Peel and Everton have come to an agreement, my emotians will be off the scale for years every time I think about it.
Wouldn't surprise me if the RS wanted to build on the waterfront they would be allowed to buy up the Liver Building and knock it down whilst the council give out a collective statement that it was an eyesore anyway and needed demolishing.
4737carlin
Player Valuation: £90m
That letter looks like something two lids came up with one night for a chuckle to see how long it would take to "Get something viral" kind of a bet.
Just the opening is enough to tell it's rubbish.
You wouldn't write to a company, cold, when the subject matter and parties involved are of that magnitude.
Anyone who has been duped by that needs to have a word with themselves.
HAHAHAHAHA!
A letter, anyone who finds that anyway plausable is of their meds.
"Dear Directors,
We would like to invest 700 mill in your Club,
Love,
China"
Get the boat, hahahaha.
A letter, anyone who finds that anyway plausable is of their meds.
"Dear Directors,
We would like to invest 700 mill in your Club,
Love,
China"
Get the boat, hahahaha.
Darth Vader
Player Valuation: £25m
Dear director
Giz yer footy club for abar 700m
I'll build yer a boss ground and dat, promise
All the best
Mr Wong
Giz yer footy club for abar 700m
I'll build yer a boss ground and dat, promise
All the best
Mr Wong
Chinese wouldn't want to be associated with that lot, imagine what damage they'd do to the great wall.
Steve Wigan
Player Valuation: £35m
ncblue
Player Valuation: £6m
Another gem from RAWK.
Re: The Everton Topic
« Reply #25013 on: Today at 08:27:37 PM »
there is no way they are getting a stadium at the docks, it just won't happen. there are too many of us to allow it to happen...paperwork going 'missing' administrative delays etc.
When did they become the Illuminati?
Re: The Everton Topic
« Reply #25013 on: Today at 08:27:37 PM »
there is no way they are getting a stadium at the docks, it just won't happen. there are too many of us to allow it to happen...paperwork going 'missing' administrative delays etc.
When did they become the Illuminati?