Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

New proposed offside rule

Status
Not open for further replies.
I dont know how you could get it exactly right without using the same tech they use for goal lines.

I just wish they’d get rid of the passive offiside rule. How can a defender on the other side of the pitch play someone ‘on’ but not an attacker right next to the ball being played judged to not be affecting play.
 
Yeah said this new offside earlier, without it been said what the actual wenger new thing was, this to me may cause even more confusion,
the one v us last night with foot over is all it should be to be called offside, not if your arm or body is leaning over the line and that is classed as offside


Until recently I thought that was the case.

It had to be a body part one could score with...e.g. foot or head....ergo an arm being “offside” didn’t count as being so.
 

So if you run through miles offside but lay it off it stands as the pass to the scorer was fine? For someone to have been well offside from the initial pass would mean that the defending side hadn't been doing its job and then continued to fail by not preventing the final pass ending up as a goal being scored.
That scenario would mean the defending team wasn't doing its job.
 
Ok. Your right. Lets abandon offsides and have 9-8 every game

Thatll be fun.

Offside is offside.

The whole 'offside is offside' thing sounds great and simple in theory but in practice the camera is a huge source of uncertainty. A lot can happen between the frames of a high speed camera. It makes those super tight offsides like Werner's against Liverpool questionable and when its that tight you can understand people wanting a margin of allowance.
 

Offside has always been controversial whatever the rules...

We now have VAR technology to enable correct decisions 100% of the time so it would be foolish not to take advantage...

Current rules are unfair for the attacking team as it favours the defending team, but under the Wenger proposal it would be reversed & favour the attacking side which has always been the objective...

I support the Wenger proposal it makes total sense to me...
 
There should be clear daylight between players. Clear gap Offside , No clear gap Onside.

So you are saying that an attacker can stand fully behind a defender, and as long as he stands so close to him that you cant see a gap he should be onside? That would be a disaster of a rule.
 
So in the daylight rule is white onside if black is defending?

XWHj_CDRr0jmdnnE-PZJGjedCW1nh6LcjRtY0Em1HVQfaSZUgtt7XHiQ7pd4xXOX52aKxreELXvzgGxlcXoSuKXlB-Czd8z0FM017jgGZXEL-8-evJ4PdRxJuZrUJl-ZD6-pV_JKCdLyt4IYKuqPEQ
 
So you are saying that an attacker can stand fully behind a defender, and as long as he stands so close to him that you cant see a gap he should be onside? That would be a disaster of a rule.
Yes would make the game between attacker and defender so much better. The attacker tries to steal a march on defender, the defender has to play tactful and skillfull and decide to defend or play offside. Make the defenders job much harder but this is more black and white than an armpit or toe.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top