New proposed offside rule

[bluenorthwarrior]

Not a fan of wenger's offside proposal, gives far too much to the attacker. Why not just base it in foot position, no other part of body.

A bigger issue in the days of millimetre offsides is that the same scrutiny is not paid to the player passing the ball. At what point is the pass made? If it is when ball loses contact with passers foot then the hundredths of a second involved in this equate to the millimetres on or offside, yet the frames are frozen for line drawing fairly arbitrarily.

As I say I would go to feet only to try and overcome this as most really contentious ones seem to be body shape-based.

 

[bluerobert]

I wish they’d bin off that rule about letting play carry on when it’s offside

 

[Carloblues]

Offside was fine the way it used to be, offside is offside but if it's tight advantage goes to the attacker.

So when they are doing the review and doing all these mad lines catching his fringe offside then anything like that should be onside, unless it's clear for the eye to see without all mad angles and lines.