New Shirt Sponsor

[kev]

Remove the ‘st’ and replace with ‘fl’ and that kit looks like a well known chocolate bar

Couldn't have a chocolate bar as sponsor . . . there would be howls of protest from those who have a problem with obesity.

 

[Papa Shango]

Remove the ‘st’ and replace with ‘fl’ and that kit looks like a well known chocolate bar

Only the crumbliest, flakiest defence?

 

[GrandOldTeam]

They could easily have done the shoot and had no sponsor - so instead would photoshop them in on a later date.

Doubt it mate.

Much more hassle than it's worth.

Cazoo are looking to save £200m a year so it's possible they initiated a clause or something themselves rather than us.

Cazoo to cut 750 jobs in UK and across Europe amid recession fears

Online car seller says ‘business realignment’ needed to protect profits in face of tougher economic times

www.theguardian.com

Don't think so - they'd have not retained other clubs/sponsorship if it wasn't delivering the return they wanted.

 

[Charles Hawtrey]

Carvana is the Cazoo of the US and they too are purportedly in financial troubles.

 

[lancs blue]

Why not have the RNLI on the shirt

They are used to saving rudderless ships and ? crews

 

[RomanReigns]

I’ve heard it’s subway and the reason why it’s taking so long to announce it is because they have had to legally change the last three letters from way to par.

 

[Wizard]

Doubt it mate.

Much more hassle than it's worth.



Don't think so - they'd have not retained other clubs/sponsorship if it wasn't delivering the return they wanted.

Cazoo have also signed 4 new deals since our deal was terminated. Marseille, Valencia, Bologna, Freiburg. Makes sense for them to have presence in multiple European markets rather than having 2 teams in the UK

 

[lesbattersby]

Usmanov has appealed his Eu sanctions an court decision to be made in next 2 weeks.... Usm it is then

 

[Acrobat]

Here is my take on this. Don't have one. My three reasons:

1. Everton are so inept at sealing a good sponsorship deal, its not worth the money or effort.
2. No problem....the club would be better off as shirt sales would be through the roof. Many more fans would by a replica top. Idiotic sponsor names surely negatively affect sales.
3. We would look boss.

 

[DanB90]

Up the sponsorless toffees.

 

[windymiller]

Here is my take on this. Don't have one. My three reasons:

1. Everton are so inept at sealing a good sponsorship deal, its not worth the money or effort.
2. No problem....the club would be better off as shirt sales would be through the roof. Many more fans would by a replica top. Idiotic sponsor names surely negatively affect sales.
3. We would look boss.

I have thought for a long time that having some god awful sponsor for the sake of less than a quarter of a Sigurdsson makes little sense. If we can get a good sponsor, great, if not go without. I wouldn't be surprised if that made it a more desirable option for sponsors.

 

[Zatara]

Everton Signs Club-Record Deal With Stake.Com

Latest news from Everton Football Club

www.evertonfc.com

Record breaking

 

[barneygumble]

Finally.

Put this one to bed.

 

[4737carlin]

Terrible, are kids shirts blank ?

 

[barneygumble]

Terrible, are kids shirts blank ?

No mention of anything yet.

But Watford’s Kids kits were blank last season.