Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Newcastle Utd (and Viz)


I assumed the FA had already banned him and that’s why he weren’t playing.

Does this mean he’s potentially looking at another ban once this one ends?
He was banned by the Italian FA previously and it applies throughout the game, I guess the FA will add to that although I'm not sure what good it does as the guy clearly has an addiction, and I know from personal experience addictions are not fun.
 

He was banned by the Italian FA previously and it applies throughout the game, I guess the FA will add to that although I'm not sure what good it does as the guy clearly has an addiction, and I know from personal experience addictions are not fun.
Oh I know mate, I’m in no way about to make light of his personal plight. It’s a grim situation for the lad. Hopefully he’s getting all the help available to him.
 
Oh I know mate, I’m in no way about to make light of his personal plight. It’s a grim situation for the lad. Hopefully he’s getting all the help available to him.
It will be interesting to see where Newcastle are in relation to Milan on this, looks like they sold a player they knew was heading for trouble.
 
It will be interesting to see where Newcastle are in relation to Milan on this, looks like they sold a player they knew was heading for trouble.
That does very much seem to be the case.

Judging by the timelines of his signing and how soon he got banned, the Italian FA must’ve been well on their way with the investigation as well.
 
It will be interesting to see where Newcastle are in relation to Milan on this, looks like they sold a player they knew was heading for trouble.
It'll be interesting to see how that goes, but I would suspect that there's very little to nothing they could do. Had he been charged at that point? No.

Had he been found guilty of a crime? No. Is there any legal responsibility to disclose any unfound suspicion, which is basically conjecture? Nope.

If you buy a car and you know the engine is still working but is on its way out, are you obliged to tell the buyer? No, but morally it's a bit meh.

If this is an additional charge, which is what it appears to be, then it's the FA suspecting he has put bets on here while under our jurisdiction, so another ban.
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top