Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Nuclear Weapons Good/Bad

Nuclear Weapons Good/Bad

  • Good

    Votes: 5 10.9%
  • Bad

    Votes: 31 67.4%
  • Green nuclear cheese on radiated toast

    Votes: 10 21.7%

  • Total voters
    46
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aside from being a truly awful human invention, the sheer amount of money we spend on maintaining and upgrading our Nuclear arsenal is gross.

The last time around, Boris Johnson decided to increase the number of warheads we have due to perceived threats fromChina and Russia.

The fact that we already likely have enough warheads to destroy the world a couple of times over, somehow we needed to spend multiple billions more on increasing this number, in the midst of a cost of living crisis, to what exactly? How does being able to destroy the world 3 times over rather than twice further ‘deter’ your supposed enemies?

Literally shovelling our economy into the pockets of arms dealers 😬
 
I'd quite like one. Just in case, like.

Indeed, good for solving boundary issues with your neighbour. If he won't put back that new fence by 1.5 cm then:

1Zwr.gif


No fences for anyone in a 30km radius. :hayee:
 
They gave them all back to be destroyed and Russia signed the treaty that guaranteed them protection for doing so. Sooner Putin is gone and decent Russians get their country back the better.

There was actually a lot of Ukrainian expertise on the maintenance and deployment of the Soviet arsenal, however you're correct - c&c was ultimately tied to Moscow.

All of the weapons in Ukraine were removed to Russia in the 90's, at that point Ukraine was actually one of the world's biggest nuclear powers and that was 'problematic'. But the deal was, security assurances from the US, UK and Russia in exchange, which does technically mean that we can give them whatever weapons and support we want at this point including troops without Russia cry arsing.
The political and strategic reality is of course far more complex.
That is interesting. Never knew about the security assurances given by Russia, US and UK. Was wondering why the US were deeply invested in Ukraine so much other than Russia being the old foe. Putin literally can't be trusted with or about anything
 
I still don't buy the destroy the world theory. If everyone set theirs off at the same time I think the world would be OK. World's massive.
 

Aside from being a truly awful human invention, the sheer amount of money we spend on maintaining and upgrading our Nuclear arsenal is gross.

The last time around, Boris Johnson decided to increase the number of warheads we have due to perceived threats fromChina and Russia.

The fact that we already likely have enough warheads to destroy the world a couple of times over, somehow we needed to spend multiple billions more on increasing this number, in the midst of a cost of living crisis, to what exactly? How does being able to destroy the world 3 times over rather than twice further ‘deter’ your supposed enemies?

Literally shovelling our economy into the pockets of arms dealers 😬
Like @peteblue ? Tag him in soft lad!
 


Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top