The kit was 78/79, good shout but to early for Mike walshPossibly Mike Walsh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The kit was 78/79, good shout but to early for Mike walshPossibly Mike Walsh
Alan Biley? they did overlap 1980-1982Possibly Mike Walsh
That photo & kit is 81/82 -Kendall first season as manager; likely to be Walsh, but could be BileyThe kit was 78/79, good shout but to early for Mike walsh
78/79 was the last year without shirt sponsors.That photo & kit is 81/82 -Kendall first season as manager; likely to be Walsh, but could be Biley
Ratcliffe didn't make his debut until March 1980, Mike Walsh signed in the summer of 81 so could conceivably be Walsh.78/79 was the last year without shirt sponsors.
There isn't a sponsors name on the picture
A couple of weeks after this they signed Shilton to complete their team. They were incredibly lucky with injuries and barely seemed to change the team all season. We chased them all the way but two heavy losses over Christmas hit us hard and in the final few games we allowed you know who to nip past us into 2nd place.
Good coach Burtenshaw. Big blow to Gordon when he left and big mistake to promote Eric Harrison to take over from him - great with kids but not popular with the senior pros.Dave Thomas, Bob Latchford, and Steve Burtenshaw, assess their progress ion the Performance Chart - no need they were a deadly duo -
View attachment 108504
I hold my hand up mate I think you are right , The thing that threw me was the shirt sponsors name not being on the shirtRatcliffe didn't make his debut until March 1980, Mike Walsh signed in the summer of 81 so could conceivably be Walsh
Not with that barnet, mate.That photo & kit is 81/82 -Kendall first season as manager; likely to be Walsh, but could be Biley
TV games had no sponsors78/79 was the last year without shirt sponsors.
There isn't a sponsors name on the picture
Your right that solves itTV games had no sponsors
Not with that barnet, mate.
It's just the hairstyle it's a blared photo of him, but it's the first instinct that came into my head - been wrong before - see its caused a nice debate on this wonderful threadI reckon Joe is correct - Ken McNaught.