You think they buy both?
No I think they've preferred Jota. I dont think they were ever going for both, but I dont think Sarr would have cost more
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You think they buy both?
No I think they've preferred Jota. I dont think they were ever going for both, but I dont think Sarr would have cost more
Jota makes the most sense, he's done it longer in the league.
Plus, something fishy about the last sentence ere.
Nar he looked a decent player that Hoever, I ain't having that he picked Wolves over the other 2 tho.Wolves transfer dealings never make sense to be but they usually work tbf
Why? Gylfi went for more.Hmm not sure. I think 45m gets Sarr too.
A championship player going for over 40m. Just thinking about that blows my mind really.
So klopp doing things a different way again, whatever, has that fella ever spoke a word if truth.
Why? Gylfi went for more.
I thought he was 40m rising to 45.
Anyway its pretty irrelevant. Judging fees based on the Walsh era probably not the best thing to do. I think 45m for Jota is twice his value.
Jota makes the most sense, he's done it longer in the league.
Plus, something fishy about the last sentence ere.
Jota makes the most sense, he's done it longer in the league.
Plus, something fishy about the last sentence ere.
Who even is Hoever, if he’s that good, why are they letting him go?