Other clubs transfers 2021

[Tubey]

Right decision from City, go all out on Haaland instead next summer. Could throw him insane wages and the cheaper transfer fee will basically cover them.

 

[Tubey]

Must be frustrating for him tbf

Meh, he signed the contract and knew he was dealing with Levy.

It's his own lack of planning that's led to this.

 

[navidson]

Thought Spurs were spending the Kane money?

 

[Yid4life]

The only official bid from City was £75mn + £25mn in bonuses.

Why would we sell him for that? City basically thought they could manipulate Spurs into lowering our demands by unsettling the player. Levy held firm.

If City wanted him so badly they should have paid up. It's not like they can't afford him.

He'll probably go in January but 100% gone next summer. I feel for the human rights abusing petro club obviously, someone actually said no to them (for a little while at least).

 

[RomanReigns]

Thought Spurs were spending the Kane money?

they have the lowest net spend of any club in the past few years i believe

they are loaded

 

[Yid4life]

Thought Spurs were spending the Kane money?

We have only bought 3 players. At least one of those on a loan with obligation.

 

[navidson]

they have the lowest net spend of any club in the past few years i believe

they are loaded

Really?

They spent £100m last summer and recouped £11m

The year before that they spent £133m and recouped £58m

 

[ToffeeTim]

That's what is reported anyway. Don't think it's a case City didn't buy him more Spurs wouldn't sell him.

150m euros according to Fab

 

[ToffeeTim]

The only official bid from City was £75mn + £25mn in bonuses.

Why would we sell him for that? City basically thought they could manipulate Spurs into lowering our demands by unsettling the player. Levy held firm.

If City wanted him so badly they should have paid up. It's not like they can't afford him.

He'll probably go in January but 100% gone next summer. I feel for the human rights abusing petro club obviously, someone actually said no to them (for a little while at least).

No chance a player of Kanes level is sold in a January window

 

[Nymzee]

150m euros according to Fab

Well £130m ish then, still a large bid of intent by City.

 

[navidson]

Do Tottenham fans just accept him back into their hearts now?

I'm guessing he's too important of a player to take a firm moral standpoint on

 

[RomanReigns]

Really?

They spent £100m last summer and recouped £11m

The year before that they spent £133m and recouped £58m

yeah i was wrong they are 9th i was looking at something else

if they sell kane and ndombele and don't sign any players before the window closes then they will be 18th on net spend list over the past 5 years only above the likes of newly promoted norwich and brentford....

 

[TheBigIguana]

Absolutely a blessing in disguise for City. They need to find a short term option for this year now at striker (or sign Mbappe) but Kane for 150m and taking yourself out of the running for a better and significantly younger player next summer was madness. I think they should test Atletico over Luis Suarez. Bring him in on a two year deal and leave the position's future open for Haaland.

 

[MikeH72]

The only official bid from City was £75mn + £25mn in bonuses.

Why would we sell him for that? City basically thought they could manipulate Spurs into lowering our demands by unsettling the player. Levy held firm.

If City wanted him so badly they should have paid up. It's not like they can't afford him.

He'll probably go in January but 100% gone next summer. I feel for the human rights abusing petro club obviously, someone actually said no to them (for a little while at least).

The shrewdest fellow I ever did see.

 

[Yid4life]

Do Tottenham fans just accept him back into their hearts now?

I'm guessing he's too important of a player to take a firm moral standpoint on

I think we accept him. Maybe not in the unequivocal way it was before but most definitely in a pragmatic way.