Oumar Niasse

[EFCPaul]

He will keep Hull and they'll build him a statue. That's my prediction.

 

[Sol]

Ready made replacement for Lukaku if/when he leaves

 

[Joey66]

Hope we beat Hull 4-3 and Niasse gets a hattrick and slams Koemans head in a locker and tells him he's taking that one.

He cannot play its a loan deal!

 

[davek]

don't be so naughty Dave, that's our managers head you are requesting to be whacked inside a locker!

Oh yeah. I wouldn't want that....

 

[brettangellnightporter]

Hope we beat Hull 4-3 and Niasse gets a hattrick and slams Koemans head in a locker and tells him he's taking that one.

This is peak davek.
He can't play.
That's knowledge of football. Waheeeyy.

 

[Woolly Blue]

I don't think it's any coincidence that we've been on a cracking run of form since he went to Hull. Shame he didn't go a week earlier, chances are we'd still be in the cup if he had.

 

[Jags]

Wish the lad nothing but well, always worked hard when he did play for us, and if he can do well for Hull,might see us get more back for him in summer.

He scored against the RS too, so yeah, he's in my good books.

 

[blue61]

He's almost certainly condemned us to being last on match of the day, the turncoat.

 

[Martino Robertez]

He cannot play its a loan deal!

There's no rules to say he can't play against us
All depends if we bothered to put a clause in the loan contract about it

 

[ilikecheese]

There's no rules to say he can't play against us
All depends if we bothered to put a clause in the loan contract about it

From Wiki:

In the Premier League, players on loan are not permitted to play against the team which holds their registration (section 7.2 of rule M.6).

 

[Martino Robertez]

From Wiki:

In the Premier League, players on loan are not permitted to play against the team which holds their registration (section 7.2 of rule M.6).

Must have changed the rules then, it was always an unenforceable gentlemans agreement.
They couldn't enforce it due to the rules about none interference with another clubs players. They had to agree not to play the players.

 

[ilikecheese]

Must have changed the rules then, it was always an unenforceable gentlemans agreement.
They couldn't enforce it due to the rules about none interference with another clubs players. They had to agree not to play the players.

I know, I know...it's The Mail...but the first article I could find.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...y-parent-clubs-fix-messed--Martin-Samuel.html

The rules that prevent Lukaku turning out against Chelsea, but leave him free to damage their rivals, were introduced to prevent gentlemen’s agreements taking place on a nod and a wink basis between managers and chairmen.

Manchester United and Everton entered one over Tim Howard, the goalkeeper who moved to Goodison Park permanently in 2007 on the condition he did not turn out against his former club that season.

Instead of reforming the loan system, however, all the league did was make gentlemen’s agreements official. It no longer required a cosy agreement behind closed doors; the Premier League removed the player from the fixture against his true owners, by law.

 

[dublinbluenose]

Two tidy finishes all the same, still wouldn't have him near Goodison mind.

 

[Maxwell]

Two good finishes today. Credit where it's due like.

 

[ToffeeTim]

He took those goals well to be fair to him