Poor Oumar, just when things were starting to look up for him, he go and gets singled out again.
As he has shown with Moonhead, he has the strength to rise above it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
Poor Oumar, just when things were starting to look up for him, he go and gets singled out again.
As he has shown with Moonhead, he has the strength to rise above it.
Osamabindiesel
Player Valuation: £70m
Which usually means it isn't as clear cut as the media want it to be. We are being used as an example. We are the one club that happens to be in the national spotlight and totally crap, so it makes sense to use us as a statement. Niasse is also irrelevant to anyone outside of this club. Had it been an English player of note it wouldn't have been debated so harshly.
trebilcock66
Player Valuation: £8m
You know this is an Everton chat site, right?
Barnfred 55
Player Valuation: £80m
Didn't realise a decision had already been made. Poor decision in my view.
And I have to disagree with your take on things mate. The Richarlison/Niasse cases are very different. The referee from Saturday has apparently said he gave the penalty for a trip (or coming together of feet/legs) which video evidence shows didn't happen. But there was a separate upper bodily contact that did take place which caused Niasse to go to ground. No penalty but no dive either. For me there is more bodily contact in the Niasse case. I've looked at the Richarlison one again and there is absolute minimal contact of any, plus it looks as though he was already on the way down to me before the tackle came in.
This just stinks of the FA covering up a poor refereeing decision to me.
Chris O'Connor
Player Valuation: £35m
It was all self-initiated contact. It was just a desperate attempt to get a late equaliser with time running out and gave him some sort of flimsy half-truth that he may just have been the victim if you were really desperate to believe him and as gullible as it's possible to be.
Abraders
Player Valuation: £60m
One of them where you realise these sorts of decisions and permanently going to split opinion even if video refereeing came into play, as even amongst ourselves we can find reasoning to justify, or not, certain decisions.
It would help if the rules were clearly defined.
4737carlin
Player Valuation: £90m
Justice for Oumar, he has been punished enough in his beautiful life
need to change the rules, if you retrospectively ban someone it doesn't benefit the team who have had to suffer as a result of it
the punishment should be that the player should be banned from playing in the next 2-3 matches against that specific club
if he transfers to a different team during a transfer window then the ban would still apply at his new club
the punishment should be that the player should be banned from playing in the next 2-3 matches against that specific club
if he transfers to a different team during a transfer window then the ban would still apply at his new club
Has he actually been convicted and banned?
I thought he had just been put on notice that he was being investigated.
Barnfred 55
Player Valuation: £80m
Think we need to clearly define what simulation is. Too me it's when a player goes to ground without any contact, and appeals. At worst, I would say that Niasse possibly instigated contact by running into the defender. The game is full of such incidents, so if Niasse is penalised retrospectively for this then everybody should be. I'd accept that.
The other thing is that the punishment should be consistent. If it's a yellow card on the pitch then retrospective punishment should be the same. Either that or make simulation a sending off offence.
evertonarntwe
Player Valuation: £35m
who did you support before the rich men come in?
- Status