Pole: would you rather

[blue61]

I'd rather trade both for a 72 year old Bob Latchford.

 

[9LeagueTitles5FACups]

Gnonto and a striker like Beto or Dia, not Adams.

But if we're considering Adams, why can't we have both Gnonto and Adams?

 

[StateSideToffee]

Neither add value to our current squad, while both would be over priced.

I do not want us to sign either.

I chose Che Adams in the poll because at least CF is a position of need whereas we already have 3 better players in Gnonto’s preferred position of LW.

 

[blindbert]

Poles apart these two

 

[davids]

Gnonto because he isn't Adams?

 

[BlueTX]

Pole?

Where you don't want your daughter?

 

[Joey66]

Which is your choice and why?

Poll

 

[Oswald P Haygood]

The message bourdes I perused as an American College Football fan would spell it that way as an inside joke. I guess oulde habits die hard Enjoy my insanity or ignore it. The choice is yores.

 

[Oswald P Haygood]

Scored 2

Trudat but he's only 19. Neither is my first choice, but where are where we are, and this is what we are looking to spend. Of these 2, I prefer Gnonto.

 

[Oswald P Haygood]

Poll

Whatever you say, pal.

 

[Oswald P Haygood]

Think he is Italian mate

I bet his mum makes a mean lasagna.

 

[Huyton Layne]

Tbh I'd rather we looked at players that didn't play last year in our league.

 

[BirkenheadBlue]

Trudat but he's only 19. Neither is my first choice, but where are where we are, and this is what we are looking to spend. Of these 2, I prefer Gnonto.

Yes he’s young, but you said “already a decent PL scorer” - that’s just not true.

 

[Eggs]

….absolutely rificulous poll because it’s not a matter of either/or.

Not voting on stupidity, where is the stupid poll option?

 

[Oswald P Haygood]

Yes he’s young, but you said “already a decent PL scorer” - that’s just not true.

Fair enough. Point conceded. I should have said decent scoring option, considering where we are. Who knows how productive he will actually be? Hopefully better than Maupay, but that ain't sayin much.