Just need to pretend there's a democratic process on Grand Old Team dot com so vote, vote, vote.
Mods, we've not decided. Right?
Mods, we've not decided. Right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rep - Anonymous Poll
- Thread starter GrandOldTeam
- Start date
- Status
JimmyJeffers
Player Valuation: £70m
No mate. We can ask Danny to make sure you are given a rep crown so everyone will always know
Upvote
0
I wasn't joking btw. Voted to bin it, just for popcorn reasons really. Now I suddenly belong to the winners. Feels nice, unexpected maybe, but still nice to be in a group of winners.
*Awaits full on neg bombs from the resistance.
**Probably deserved.
Upvote
0
I take it as a compliment people think we'd need to rig a poll - like it matters.
Although to be fair, I was (I think) the only mod who wanted rep - which is why I brought it back for the third time. I dont go buying stuff and spending hours arsing about to set it up without wanting it to work.
I'm flogging a dead horse though. Rep isn't default software, the software company behind the forum dont think it's needed. Rep is a commercial plug in we buy/config and it's a bit of a time bandit. Whenever I update the forum for compliance, I'm having to patch rep so it's got to be something the community wants.
This is the post I shared with moderators a short while back;
Rep - we've had a rep system at numerous spells since 2007.
The latest version has been enabled since 23rd April and there's been 4,766 reps left.
When we enabled it, we did so with a view to assessing before moderators making a call on whether it stays.
So, should it?
I'm of the view is can increase engagement through allowing users to make a comment/engagement they otherwise wouldn't. Sometimes there's a comment that doesn't feel worthy of a reply - a random snapshot below;
The flipside is - it can cause angst.
That said, I'm of the view that we shouldn't moderate to a path of least resistance - a few recent reports cause annoyance but that shouldn't dictate our approach. How many *really* abuse the rep system? We could simply revoke their access to rep.
Angst will always exist, whether on an open forum, through reps - its the nature of forums.
We'll always have people crying they are being picked on.
Anyway... poll to decide
So...
Rep - keep as is.
Rep - continue trial with changes.
Rep - bin it.
Mods voted for continue trial with changes, but given the time/cost and the appetite for it on the forum is pretty 50/50 - I'm making a call it's not worth it. Middle finger reaction beats moody rep comment anyway.
Removal of rep might mean theres now a place for profile posts to come back though...
Upvote
0
- Status