2021/22 Richarlison

[mahermi1]

Well do we want to sell him or not? If you don't then sure wait for 75m but we'll be in really bad shape both financially and with what we can put on the field.

If you want to sell him you've got to come down.

Rubbish as usual, and Math 15 to 20m added on to 50m is not £75m , you do know that don't you..

 

[TheBigIguana]

Rubbish as usual, and Math 15 to 20m added on to 50m is not £75m , you do know that don't you..

What price would you want him to be sold at?

I'm happy with 50m, thrilled even. High 40s still has to get done.

 

[Goat]

If you want to sell him you've got to come down.

People wont like it, but thats precisely what interested clubs are telling us I reckon.

 

[ToffeeTim]

People wont like it, but thats precisely what interested clubs are telling us I reckon.

Fine, then don't sell.

It would be extremely weak and not in the club's interest to sell for under 50m when far worse players have gone for more.

 

[Goat]

Fine, then don't sell.

It would be extremely weak and not in the club's interest to sell for under 50m when far worse players have gone for more.

Dont sell, dont buy.

We hold no cards.

 

[ToffeeTim]

Dont sell, dont buy.

We hold no cards.

I'd rather have Richarlison for another year and not buy anyone than sell on the cheap.

Get rid of other surplus players and shop in the loan and free agency markets. We have much more chance of not being in a relegation scrap again with Richarlison, than without Richarlison

I am more than ok with selling him, but not for less than the likes of Ben White and Pepe cost, and far less than the unproven lad from Benfica.

 

[TheBigIguana]

Fine, then don't sell.

It would be extremely weak and not in the club's interest to sell for under 50m when far worse players have gone for more.

Not if he's not signing a new contract. It is very much in the club's interest to sell if he's not going to commit to more years.

 

[TheBigIguana]

I'd rather have Richarlison for another year and not buy anyone than sell on the cheap.

Get rid of other surplus players and shop in the loan and free agency markets. We have much more chance of not being in a relegation scrap again with Richarlison, than without Richarlison

I am more than ok with selling him, but not for less than the likes of Ben White and Pepe cost, and far less than the unproven lad from Benfica.

We might go down.

Nuñez had a bigger market for good reason.

 

[ToffeeTim]

Not if he's not signing a new contract. It is very much in the club's interest to sell if he's not going to commit to more years.

Sell for a good fee, yes.

Sell on the cheap, to a top 6 club, no.

These clubs have the money. The deals for Pepe, Darwin Nunez etc have set the market. Let's see them show they are serious.

 

[Goat]

I'd rather have Richarlison for another year and not buy anyone than sell on the cheap.

Get rid of other surplus players and shop in the loan and free agency markets. We have much more chance of not being in a relegation scrap again with Richarlison, than without Richarlison

I am more than ok with selling him, but not for less than the likes of Ben White and Pepe cost, and far less than the unproven lad from Benfica.

And thats fine, but maybe Lampard doesnt share this view.

Maybe he wants to bring in some players.

 

[ToffeeTim]

We might go down.

Nuñez had a bigger market for good reason.

I know little about him, other than he has a very difficult task replacing Mane, and hasn't played many games at a good standard. My instinct is that he will struggle.

 

[TheBigIguana]

Sell for a good fee, yes.

Sell on the cheap, to a top 6 club, no.

These clubs have the money. The deals for Pepe, Darwin Nunez etc have set the market. Let's see them show they are serious.

Pepe may not have worked but the market at the time was higher on him for a reason. Nunez is higher for a reason. Unfortunately when you're scoring 10ish goals a season in the league that you're being bought for the assumption is you might bump that a little and not that you're going to win the golden boot so teams aren't paying 70m.

 

[TheBigIguana]

I know little about him, other than he has a very difficult task replacing Mane, and hasn't played many games at a good standard. My instinct is that he will struggle.

He's not replacing Mane they already did that.

And funnily enough the replacement played at the same standard as Nunez and has been quite good for them so far. The RS have the money and standing to make it easier but they've done pretty well for themselves in the market.

 

[MikeH72]

I know little about him, other than he has a very difficult task replacing Mane, and hasn't played many games at a good standard. My instinct is that he will struggle.

Unfortunately he is scoring 40 next season mate.

 

[ToffeeTim]

He's not replacing Mane they already did that.

And funnily enough the replacement played at the same standard as Nunez and has been quite good for them so far. The RS have the money and standing to make it easier but they've done pretty well for themselves in the market.

Diaz is a good player, but nowhere near as good as Mane. Diaz has only scored 4 league goals for them so far.