Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Roman Abramovich hands over ‘stewardship and care’ of Chelsea football club

Status
Not open for further replies.
stony said:
Man city do not have commercial deals that is over half their turnover, that is demonstrably untrue and only believed by idiots.
Click to expand...
Your turnover was 569 million with commercial revenues of £290 million.

Puma 60 million Hays 4 million Nexus 15 million vitality 1 milion per year.

CAS trial revealed that Etihad the biggest loss making airline this century in 2019 was paying your club per year £140 million, an original 10 year deal was inked in 2011 at 40 million a year haha.

You have another 9 owner linked commercial deals with 4 of them added this year.

Self reliant though ???, if your owners left with their commercial deals you'd have a turnover on par with Southampton, the high TV revenues, the CL revenues would cease to exist.as you wouldn't be qualifying for it as your lavishly bought players would be off as you wouldn't be able to sustain the wage bill with the owners no longer propping up the turnover.

Harsh facts but true, you're just in the same boat as Chelsea, a club built on quick sand so reliant on cash injections from your owner every summer.

Everyone on this forum knows this is true about your club, im the only one who says it sadly.
 
Inappropriate Language
EverTheOptimist said:
Your turnover was 569 million with commercial revenues of £290 million.

Puma 60 million Hays 4 million Nexus 15 million vitality 1 milion per year.

CAS trial revealed that Etihad the biggest loss making airline this century in 2019 was paying your club per year £140 million, an original 10 year deal was inked in 2011 at 40 million a year haha.

You have another 9 owner linked commercial deals with 4 of them added this year.

Self reliant though ???, if your owners left with their commercial deals you'd have a turnover on par with Southampton, the high TV revenues, the CL revenues would cease to exist.as you wouldn't be qualifying for it as your lavishly bought players would be off as you wouldn't be able to sustain the wage bill with the owners nonlonger propping up the turnover.

Harsh facts but true,your just in the same boat as Chelsea, a club built on quick sand so reliant on cash injections from your owner.

Everyone on this forum knows this is true about your club, im the only be who says it sadly.
Click to expand...
We made more money from TV revenue last year than from all our commercial deals. That fact alone proves you are full of bullshit. You really are a noxious little turd who believes everything you read from all the Liverpool fanzines.
 
EverTheOptimist said:
Which bit is not factually correct.

What are you saying that those clubs (Chelsea , PSG and City) do not rely on external income linked to owners hahahaha!!!

New season is excellent.
Click to expand...
No idea about the PSG and City stuff (I don't care tbh) but you are wrong about Chelsea. Chelsea relied on Abramovich for the first 9 years until they started to show a very small profit. It was then another 3 years before they started to really make proper money and became self sufficient. Since then Roman Abramovich has only wired money twice to help/support Chelsea (albeit large amounts) You are trying to lump them in with City and they are worlds apart, Chelsea are an established football club with a massive fanbase (I know as i live down south) Man City are a diy club.
 

EverTheOptimist said:
Your turnover was 569 million with commercial revenues of £290 million.

Puma 60 million Hays 4 million Nexus 15 million vitality 1 milion per year.

CAS trial revealed that Etihad the biggest loss making airline this century in 2019 was paying your club per year £140 million, an original 10 year deal was inked in 2011 at 40 million a year haha.

You have another 9 owner linked commercial deals with 4 of them added this year.

Self reliant though ???, if your owners left with their commercial deals you'd have a turnover on par with Southampton, the high TV revenues, the CL revenues would cease to exist.as you wouldn't be qualifying for it as your lavishly bought players would be off as you wouldn't be able to sustain the wage bill with the owners no longer propping up the turnover.

Harsh facts but true, you're just in the same boat as Chelsea, a club built on quick sand so reliant on cash injections from your owner every summer.

Everyone on this forum knows this is true about your club, im the only one who says it sadly.
Click to expand...
Built on quicksand- thats a new one. Just a reminder, both these clubs won European trophies before you lot, so in my book they have been here quite a while.
 

Simon Buttle said:
No idea about the PSG and City stuff (I don't care tbh) but you are wrong about Chelsea. Chelsea relied on Abramovich for the first 9 years until they started to show a very small profit. It was then another 3 years before they started to really make proper money and became self sufficient. Since then Roman Abramovich has only wired money twice to help/support Chelsea (albeit large amounts) You are trying to lump them in with City and they are worlds apart, Chelsea are an established football club with a massive fanbase (I know as i live down south) Man City are a diy club.
Click to expand...
Chelsea fans pretending they were bigger than City before the Roman are just kidding themselves.
 
Jeez… this isn’t reflecting well on RA himself, Chelsea or indeed the FA or the PL.

A little bit of scrutiny and RA is scuttling off.

What has he got to hide?
 
Not that it’ll matter too much as we all face the prospect of WW3, Chelsea face the prospect of returning to their usual level pre RA.

In fact this might be the start of the end of big money floating around English football full stop.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register
Back
Top