Imagine the midfield of 10 years ago behind him. Arteta, Pienaar, Cahill & even Baines supplying him.
To be honest Joey, I remember Del a year ago, supplying him with chance after chance
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Imagine the midfield of 10 years ago behind him. Arteta, Pienaar, Cahill & even Baines supplying him.
Moyes would have sacked him for not running the channels enough.Imagine the midfield of 10 years ago behind him. Arteta, Pienaar, Cahill & even Baines supplying him.
Moyes would have sacked him for not running the channels enough.
I totally agree but Moyes' big achilles heel was strikers. He ruined a number of them.I think peak Cahill would have been the perfect foil for him personally.
To be honest Joey, I remember Del a year ago, supplying him with chance after chance
We should sign 2015 Del. Why did we ever let him leave?
Him being "useless" today had little to do with him today, but with the "tactics" of RK. The first goal literally falls out of the sky and Lukaku's one as well. Barkley hoofs the ball away (as he should, considering where he was with the ball) and Lukaku makes something out of that.It's not hard to understand. Again today he was by and large useless all game, then scores an absolute belter. That's Lukaku - crap and incredible at the same time, and a lot of people don't see enough of the incredible and too much of the crap.
The bloke is unbelievable mate. If he had quality around him he'd be unstoppable.
Him being "useless" today had little to do with him today, but with the "tactics" of RK. The first goal literally falls out of the sky and Lukaku's one as well. Barkley hoofs the ball away (as he should, considering where he was with the ball) and Lukaku makes something out of that.
There were literally zero good balls to him until the 82nd minute. Our tactic seems to be hoof it at him and hope he does what he did for the goal every game. Needless to say, he can't do that every week.
But did he do anything to involve himself in the overall team play other than wait for those hoofs?
That's the problem with him. He's isolated because he doesn't involve himself, because he lacks the capability to do so. Therefore he's a luxury player for the vast majority of every game, and when he's your sole striker you simply can't afford to have him be that anonymous 89 minutes every game.
But did he do anything to involve himself in the overall team play other than wait for those hoofs?
That's the problem with him. He's isolated because he doesn't involve himself, because he lacks the capability to do so. Therefore he's a luxury player for the vast majority of every game, and when he's your sole striker you simply can't afford to have him be that anonymous 89 minutes every game.
The whole point of only playing one striker is for them to focus on being there to finish the chances the creative players make. The problem, as perfectly shown today, is not Lukaku not involving himself, it's the failure of the system to involve him in the right way. As soon as we stopped hoofing it over his head and have him actual service, he started to cause problems e.g. the ball for Gueye. That was because we brought Barkley on, who had a good cameo and actually gave Lukaku a good ball to work with.
We shouldn't and don't need our lone striker building our attacks for us when his fellow attackers do the basics properly.
To be fair tubes he came deep, he went wide, he did try and get involved, but the big massive gap from midfield to attack was so big I expected a plane to land in it at 1 point.
Hes vastly isolated and has been all season.
When we stick the boy Gabi up top alongside him hes gonna make you cry.