zirc
Player Valuation: £40m
Trade you him for a stadium
- Status
sageyefc
Player Valuation: £90m
Utd blew 50 mil on an unknown in martial. Factor in tv deal going up 50% and a lack of genuine 20+ goals a season strikers in world football
duncs pigeon
Player Valuation: £35m
United were buying Kane in the last window,,now its Rom - lazy journalism
tonka1878
Player Valuation: £20m
Could you put this at the top of every page?
We should be able to avoid relegation then
technojoe
Player Valuation: £10m
Optimistic, I like it!
Yeah but their stadium is in Manchester like...
zirc
Player Valuation: £40m
So about as far as Kirkby then
God don't let it go to a vote
Rom has the same homegrown status though under the current rules whch are based on the number of years a player has spent in the British footballing system before the age of 21.
Coffee and TV
Player Valuation: £25m
Never thought about this before, good to know though:
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/public/football/article4670524.ece
Exclusive: Romelu Lukaku sell-on oversight may cost Chelsea millions
Chelsea’s transfer dealings will come under renewed scrutiny after it emerged that the club did not secure a sell-on clause while negotiating Romelu Lukaku’s move to Everton two years ago.
The Belgium striker is valued at more than £60 million amid interest from Manchester United, Juventus and Real Madrid, but The Timeshas learnt that Chelsea would not receive a penny from the sale of their former player should Everton decide to cash in.
Chelsea also failed to include a sell-on clause when concluding Kevin de Bruyne’s £18 million transfer to Wolfsburg in January 2014, an oversight that cost them several million pounds as the Belgian was sold to Manchester City for £55 million 18 months later. With Lukaku also likely to be sold for a profit at some stage, Chelsea appear to have made the same mistake again. However, in mitigation, the club had made a considerable profit on both players despite their limited first-team action.
De Bruyne was signed for £7 million from Genk before being sold for a profit of £11 million two years later, while Chelsea sold Lukaku for £28 million three years after paying £18 million to Anderlecht. Both sales were negotiated by Marina Granovskaia, the club director, who retains the backing of Roman Abramovich despite the repeated oversight. The Russian is renowned as a tough negotiator, with her skills helping Chelsea to make £107 million from player sales over the past two seasons.
Sell-on clauses were the preserve of smaller clubs, but are increasingly used by the elite. Arsenal, for example, made £5.6 million from Barcelona’s sale of Cesc Fàbregas to Chelsea two years ago having included a 20 per cent sell-on clause when their captain left for the Nou Camp three years previously.
Lukaku’s sale is a sore point at Chelsea as he has scored 19 goals this season while their strikers have struggled. Diego Costa has returned to form with five goals in as many matches but he has not trained this week after bruising a tibia against Everton last weekend and is a doubt for the Barclays Premier League match away to Arsenal on Sunday, when Eden Hazard should return from a hip problem. Mesut Özil should be fit to return for Arsenal after a toe injury.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/public/football/article4670524.ece
Exclusive: Romelu Lukaku sell-on oversight may cost Chelsea millions
Chelsea’s transfer dealings will come under renewed scrutiny after it emerged that the club did not secure a sell-on clause while negotiating Romelu Lukaku’s move to Everton two years ago.
The Belgium striker is valued at more than £60 million amid interest from Manchester United, Juventus and Real Madrid, but The Timeshas learnt that Chelsea would not receive a penny from the sale of their former player should Everton decide to cash in.
Chelsea also failed to include a sell-on clause when concluding Kevin de Bruyne’s £18 million transfer to Wolfsburg in January 2014, an oversight that cost them several million pounds as the Belgian was sold to Manchester City for £55 million 18 months later. With Lukaku also likely to be sold for a profit at some stage, Chelsea appear to have made the same mistake again. However, in mitigation, the club had made a considerable profit on both players despite their limited first-team action.
De Bruyne was signed for £7 million from Genk before being sold for a profit of £11 million two years later, while Chelsea sold Lukaku for £28 million three years after paying £18 million to Anderlecht. Both sales were negotiated by Marina Granovskaia, the club director, who retains the backing of Roman Abramovich despite the repeated oversight. The Russian is renowned as a tough negotiator, with her skills helping Chelsea to make £107 million from player sales over the past two seasons.
Sell-on clauses were the preserve of smaller clubs, but are increasingly used by the elite. Arsenal, for example, made £5.6 million from Barcelona’s sale of Cesc Fàbregas to Chelsea two years ago having included a 20 per cent sell-on clause when their captain left for the Nou Camp three years previously.
Lukaku’s sale is a sore point at Chelsea as he has scored 19 goals this season while their strikers have struggled. Diego Costa has returned to form with five goals in as many matches but he has not trained this week after bruising a tibia against Everton last weekend and is a doubt for the Barclays Premier League match away to Arsenal on Sunday, when Eden Hazard should return from a hip problem. Mesut Özil should be fit to return for Arsenal after a toe injury.
The Esk
Player Valuation: £70m
The master and originator of sports management, image rights and player contracts, Mark McCormack (who set up IMG - his first 3 clients were Nicklaus, Palmer and Player) had this sorted in the late 1950's.
Remarkable that such lessons have been ignored by some of the best sporting and legal minds in the country.
Mo' Better Blues
Player Valuation: £950k
I'd imagine rather than 'forgetting' to add in a sell on clause we told them we wouldn't pay £28 million with one included...
I would guess Chelsea's negotiation objective on both was to get as much money as possible at the time rather than sell ons as they were a bit paranoid about FFP.
- Status