zirc
Player Valuation: £40m
Trade you him for a stadiumAll up front, no instalments.
Trade you him for a stadiumAll up front, no instalments.
Utd blew 50 mil on an unknown in martial. Factor in tv deal going up 50% and a lack of genuine 20+ goals a season strikers in world footballReally 65m? I don't know about that guys. Maybe though
Could you put this at the top of every page?Just a reminder, Rom is going nowhere.
We should be able to avoid relegation thenRom is going nowhere this window.
Optimistic, I like it!We should be able to avoid relegation then
Yeah but their stadium is in Manchester like...Trade you him for a stadium
So about as far as Kirkby thenYeah but their stadium is in Manchester like...
God don't let it go to a voteSo about as far as Kirkby then
Rom has the same homegrown status though under the current rules whch are based on the number of years a player has spent in the British footballing system before the age of 21.Not British though
Never thought about this before, good to know though:
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/public/football/article4670524.ece
Exclusive: Romelu Lukaku sell-on oversight may cost Chelsea millions
Chelsea’s transfer dealings will come under renewed scrutiny after it emerged that the club did not secure a sell-on clause while negotiating Romelu Lukaku’s move to Everton two years ago.
The Belgium striker is valued at more than £60 million amid interest from Manchester United, Juventus and Real Madrid, but The Timeshas learnt that Chelsea would not receive a penny from the sale of their former player should Everton decide to cash in.
Chelsea also failed to include a sell-on clause when concluding Kevin de Bruyne’s £18 million transfer to Wolfsburg in January 2014, an oversight that cost them several million pounds as the Belgian was sold to Manchester City for £55 million 18 months later. With Lukaku also likely to be sold for a profit at some stage, Chelsea appear to have made the same mistake again. However, in mitigation, the club had made a considerable profit on both players despite their limited first-team action.
De Bruyne was signed for £7 million from Genk before being sold for a profit of £11 million two years later, while Chelsea sold Lukaku for £28 million three years after paying £18 million to Anderlecht. Both sales were negotiated by Marina Granovskaia, the club director, who retains the backing of Roman Abramovich despite the repeated oversight. The Russian is renowned as a tough negotiator, with her skills helping Chelsea to make £107 million from player sales over the past two seasons.
Sell-on clauses were the preserve of smaller clubs, but are increasingly used by the elite. Arsenal, for example, made £5.6 million from Barcelona’s sale of Cesc Fàbregas to Chelsea two years ago having included a 20 per cent sell-on clause when their captain left for the Nou Camp three years previously.
Lukaku’s sale is a sore point at Chelsea as he has scored 19 goals this season while their strikers have struggled. Diego Costa has returned to form with five goals in as many matches but he has not trained this week after bruising a tibia against Everton last weekend and is a doubt for the Barclays Premier League match away to Arsenal on Sunday, when Eden Hazard should return from a hip problem. Mesut Özil should be fit to return for Arsenal after a toe injury.
Never thought about this before, good to know though:
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/public/football/article4670524.ece
Exclusive: Romelu Lukaku sell-on oversight may cost Chelsea millions
Chelsea’s transfer dealings will come under renewed scrutiny after it emerged that the club did not secure a sell-on clause while negotiating Romelu Lukaku’s move to Everton two years ago.
The Belgium striker is valued at more than £60 million amid interest from Manchester United, Juventus and Real Madrid, but The Timeshas learnt that Chelsea would not receive a penny from the sale of their former player should Everton decide to cash in.
Chelsea also failed to include a sell-on clause when concluding Kevin de Bruyne’s £18 million transfer to Wolfsburg in January 2014, an oversight that cost them several million pounds as the Belgian was sold to Manchester City for £55 million 18 months later. With Lukaku also likely to be sold for a profit at some stage, Chelsea appear to have made the same mistake again. However, in mitigation, the club had made a considerable profit on both players despite their limited first-team action.
De Bruyne was signed for £7 million from Genk before being sold for a profit of £11 million two years later, while Chelsea sold Lukaku for £28 million three years after paying £18 million to Anderlecht. Both sales were negotiated by Marina Granovskaia, the club director, who retains the backing of Roman Abramovich despite the repeated oversight. The Russian is renowned as a tough negotiator, with her skills helping Chelsea to make £107 million from player sales over the past two seasons.
Sell-on clauses were the preserve of smaller clubs, but are increasingly used by the elite. Arsenal, for example, made £5.6 million from Barcelona’s sale of Cesc Fàbregas to Chelsea two years ago having included a 20 per cent sell-on clause when their captain left for the Nou Camp three years previously.
Lukaku’s sale is a sore point at Chelsea as he has scored 19 goals this season while their strikers have struggled. Diego Costa has returned to form with five goals in as many matches but he has not trained this week after bruising a tibia against Everton last weekend and is a doubt for the Barclays Premier League match away to Arsenal on Sunday, when Eden Hazard should return from a hip problem. Mesut Özil should be fit to return for Arsenal after a toe injury.