If that was the case then I don't see why they spent £33mil on the unproven Lukaku lite mate...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
If that was the case then I don't see why they spent £33mil on the unproven Lukaku lite mate...
Coffee and TV
Player Valuation: £25m
I think they want to play 2 up front and think they're lacking depth for that system.
Nil Satis Niasse Optimum
Player Valuation: £20m
Waiting game isn't going to work in their favour. They know his price NOW is around 65m. The longer they wait, the more expensive he gets, as we have less time to get replacements in. To me regardless of price he shouldn't be sold, as we cannot attract similar quality players to join us any more. Just tell him he ain't going anywhere and that's that.
Going nowhere, no ones paying the dough.
If they wanted him, they'd have paid it.
If they wanted him, they'd have paid it.
Costa is still there mate. Genuinely unless he moves I just can't see them paying £65-70mil for Rom. They may go for Icardi, as reported a few days ago.
I do think there's another twist in this to come, maybe one or two, but think we'll b e extremely stubborn. We don't like being messed about. Raiola knows the score and by all accounts is happy - he makes money either way. Rom also knows the score.
You've made that up haven't you?
I do think they want him, but seem to think they can get him for less. We ain't rolling over - no matter what Rom does.
Unless they meet our valuation, he's not going.
Don't get me wrong, a lot of teams want him but how many really want him that much?
Chelsea would have to shift 2 to get him
Foot Long Hot Dog
Player Valuation: A packet of pork scratchings
windymiller
Player Valuation: £60m
The above is a theory that has been proposed by one poster, with no corroboration whatsoever from any other sources least of all the club itself, and now everyone assumes it is gospel. I hope it is true but I'm not convinced. We can increase our wage bill by £7M p.a. without having to raise revenue. If our wage bill increases by more than £7M by bringing in Gueye, Stekelenberg, Williams, Bolasie and Kone after shedding Howard, Hibbert, Osman, Pienaar and Stones from last years bill then we have been as fleeced on wages as we have been on fees.
I think there will be a net spend this summer but only because of increased TV revenues not because of inward investment. I also predict an increase in the wage bill of less than £7M which would mean the Stones sale would only be necessary for generating cash for transfer fees. I stress though that I have no inside knowledge and this is just how it is appearing with the transfers we have been linked to.
Only time will tell who is going to be right.
Funny, Because I see another poster has alluded to the same thing
You just keep on being a child though
larrygobfiend
Player Valuation: £40m
Get out of the house for a bit, mate....You might meet a few people, maybe make a friend or two.
Don't be scared x
- Status