Ronald Koeman discussion

[BlueToff]

Would rather he drop one of Gana or Schneiderlin myself mate, also, would like to see Sandro playing off Lewin in a front 2, think we would see more of what Sandro is capable of then.

Agree it's flexible.

I just don't think he can justify dropping Davies but I think he'll want Gana in there for the energy. Thing is, neither Davies nor Gana work well together in a 2, so MS needs to be in I think.

Schneiderlin, Davies, Sig - with Sandro in a three with Rooney - could be a good one.

 

[Connor]

He wouldn't because we need legs, and he has none

Stop being horrible towards GBaz, Mike.

 

[Joey66]

I'm no a WUM Joseph.

No but its fetched all the chickens off their roost!lol

 

[Khalekan]

He didn't. He said we spend £140mill to challenge for a top 4 spot.

He's not wrong.

But Koeman doesn't believe so, so here's to hoping for that 7th place trophy.

+1

 

[Ihaters]

Is that bizarre to think we should be challenging for top 4?. Koeman has spent £250m since hes been here.

It wouldn't be bizarre if that was the net spend.

 

[jceverton]

All 1 million!!!??!!?

Well you said it?!!

 

[MikeH72]

Stop being horrible towards GBaz, Mike.

I hold nothing at all against him C, s'just fachts.

 

[degsy]

It's going to be a very interesting team selection and, hopefully performance tomorrow.

 

[Nymzee]

His line-up tomorrow will tell me all I need to know about him as a manager.

 

[ijjysmith]

Well you said it?!!

Pick a number between 1 and 1 million

 

[Titus Bramble]

Pick a number between 1 and 1 million

68654

 

[ijjysmith]

68654

Not you TB

 

[Paul w]

Yeah lets just give up eh.

Give up what,being in the top4 ,it was never happening but you carry on living in dream world mate.

 

[Khalekan]

A large part of the piece focuses on letting lukaku go without finding a replacement. It refers to spending too much time trying to get the Sig deal over the line. It also refers to having no plan b in respect of giroud.

Exactly.

Totally spot on, practically every word of that article.

 

[Nymzee]

Exactly.

Totally spot on, practically every word of that article.

But also being 100% obvious and thus another pointless article.