kithnou
Player Valuation: £70m
Thank you! About the post the same.Which is fine, if he set the same deadline for Lukaku.
As it stands, it's just hypocrisy. Come out and say you're selling Lukaku because he didn't sign then.
Total hypocrisy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you! About the post the same.Which is fine, if he set the same deadline for Lukaku.
As it stands, it's just hypocrisy. Come out and say you're selling Lukaku because he didn't sign then.
I think he's told Rom your going nowhere, until next summer.Which is fine, if he set the same deadline for Lukaku.
As it stands, it's just hypocrisy. Come out and say you're selling Lukaku because he didn't sign then.
Again, contract length. If Lukaku is still here next summer and it's the same situation the same words will be said.
They still put a contract on the table.
His own words - 'If you take so much time (in signing) you have doubts (about staying). The board has worked a long time' - so what's the difference? Lukaku has doubts about staying obviously, so hold him to th e same standards.
That's not mentioned.
All that is said is "contract on table, sign it or we'll sell you as if you don't by this arbitrary time limit, you obviously have doubts about staying so leave."
That applies to Lukaku.
Contract length not mentioned; only the offer of the contract itself. That's moving the goalposts.
The reality - Koeman/Everton won't mess with Raiola. Weakness.
In 12 months time Barkley walks for nothing, in 12 months time we will still get a sizeable fee for Lukaku.
That's not mentioned.
All that is said is "contract on table, sign it or we'll sell you as if you don't by this arbitrary time limit, you obviously have doubts about staying so leave."
That applies to Lukaku.
They still put a contract on the table.
His own words - 'If you take so much time (in signing) you have doubts (about staying). The board has worked a long time' - so what's the difference? Lukaku has doubts about staying obviously, so hold him to the same standards.
You don't need to mention the length because everyone already knows the situation.
It's more that Koeman is not arsed if Barkley leaves.
And I'm getting very near that feeling too.
Fine, he's allowed that view - he's the manager. But in that case say he's surplus to requirements and, you know, don't offer an unwanted player a contract. Don't be a hypocrite in your treatment of him in public when set against another player in the squad.
Yup, don't think Koemans arsed in the slightest. Which is a shame.
It's not the same situation in a few ways though.
The main one being he doesn't care if Ross leaves but does if Lukaku leaves.
Nothing wrong with that.