Honestly think the Sigurdsson pursuit was an option of Ross did not sign.
We tried to sign Sigurdsson last summer mate, according to the player himself.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Honestly think the Sigurdsson pursuit was an option of Ross did not sign.
Then it's up to the club to decide if he's worth that outlay. If he is, great, sign him on. If not, great, get rid. It's asset management.
What's it's not is down to the manager to devalue that asset in public. I really wouldn't have minded if we had sold Barkley, but we'd have sold him on the cheap for no reason due to the way we handled it.
that's just nonsense...the value of the player being reduced is to do with him having one year left on his contract and nothing else...he was publicly declared valued by his manager and an extortionate priceteag was put on his head to ward off immediate offers... there is no evidence anywhere of him actually being sold for less than 50mil up until this point so IMO Koeman handled it perfectly.
But Bolasie was a good signing though
He was doing fine then got hurt by an on pitch injury. Not much you can do about that
Ha nah won't happen.
We have a Director of Football for a reason though. Walsh has probably looked at it and thought, "nah Ron, we're not losing a potential £60m+ asset for £30m - we can sell him next summer if need be."
Barkley will have to come back flying to get regular game time under a manager who doesn't rate him, but even if he bombs and plays 15 games next season, we'll still get £30m for him anyway from a West Ham looking for that "big" signing, so it's risk free to tie him down.
We tried to sign Sigurdsson last summer mate, according to the player himself.
I strongly disagree mate
There was no need for him to give that public ultimatum
No one is going to convince me that that was a good idea
AC Milan odds on to sign Ross now if you believe the media -
http://www.[Poor language removed]/...-giants-leap-frog-tottenham-as-64-favourites/
Looks like it's about 50-50 whether one thinks if Koeman mishandled it or not. I think he handled it with his mind on future transfers in and needed to know one way or another. One thing is for sure and that is Koeman wanted him to sign. I suppose that's opinions for you. We could go on forever once the opinion is set in stone. Saying that I hope this story is true and he signs.
???!?!?!? mate???!?
I strongly disagree mate
There was no need for him to give that public ultimatum
No one is going to convince me that that was a good idea
Bang onIf he signs, it's because the board have got on with negotiating with him properly and binning off Koeman and his ridiculous deadline. His agent would have probably got him an extra £25k a week and did his job for his client.
It'd be the right outcome for everyone for the next five years and hopefully beyond, instead of the wrong outcome dictated by a manager who will be here another two years tops.
No matter what here, Koeman played this out horribly. If Koeman had his way, we'd lose a player for certain for a fraction of his value for no reason whatsoever. I don't mind Koeman, but when he goofs, he goofs, and people should call it as they see it.