Are we really better off without Roscoe Barkley in the Everton side? That's not for me to say but, no, no we're not.
Any kind of fool can see, that the Park End was wrong and we just can't live without you babe.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are we really better off without Roscoe Barkley in the Everton side? That's not for me to say but, no, no we're not.
Any kind of fool can see, that the Park End was wrong and we just can't live without you babe.
The GSE has always been Pro-Ross, but hes turned into a Main Stander.
Get your head down you planet sized man.
Im not sure.I've said a bit about Ross on this thread.But im starting to think now that Koeman is trying to drive him out of the club.
Except that he rejected a lucrative move to Chelsea to sign for a club that will pay him less than we will....
Will he be willing to accept £60k a week from Spurs? Because they're currently refusing to offer their best defender Alderweireld any more than that with 18 months remaining on his contract.
...Harry Winks has just won his first international cap and it’s reported Spurs are prepared to double his salary to £40k per week. The Reds pay their reserve players more than that so it could be a problem for Spurs in years to come. I suspect Barkley will have already been offered an amount he finds acceptable (perhaps £80k-£100k).
I find it hard to believe, on the strict budget that they're operating on, that they'd be willing to make Barkley one of their top earners over the likes of Alli, Eriksen, Alderweireld and Rose who have been there years and got them to where they are. Don't forget, Spurs were willing to let Barkley go to Chelsea in the summer without even tabling a bid, they can't rate him that highly.
..if the interest is to be believed, then surely Barkley and his representatives have already agreed a contract. I can imagine the terms offered by Chelsea were considerably more but the player appears to have set his heart on joining Spurs.
Imagine if you were one of the above mentioned Spurs players though. You'd be furious wouldn't you, break your back to improve your game year in year out and help the club finish in the top 3 two years on the bounce on a modest wage, to see some no-mark who's done nothing in his career come straight in on double your salary. That could prove to unsettle a good chunk of the squad if it is the case, and Spurs can't afford that at this stage in their development.
My guess is Spurs are readying Barkley as a replacement for someone. with their wage structure they've struggled to keep their top players - i can't imagine why any of their players would want to leave personally but money rules the game and if someone offers Kane or Delle almost double their money their heads will be turned.Imagine if you were one of the above mentioned Spurs players though. You'd be furious wouldn't you, break your back to improve your game year in year out and help the club finish in the top 3 two years on the bounce on a modest wage, to see some no-mark who's done nothing in his career come straight in on double your salary. That could prove to unsettle a good chunk of the squad if it is the case, and Spurs can't afford that at this stage in their development.
..that happens at all clubs, though. Acquisitions are often on more than those already contracted. It’s why the likes of Duncan Ferguson had a clause that he would always be the top earner.
I think the bigger problem for Spurs is when other clubs offer the likes of Harry Kane and Delli Ali £300k per week.
My guess is Spurs are readying Barkley as a replacement for someone. with their wage structure they've struggled to keep their top players - i can't imagine why any of their players would want to leave personally but money rules the game and if someone offers Kane or Delle almost double their money their heads will be turned.