Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's funny how it was supposedly brought in to correct bad decisions but now has some fellas sat hundreds of miles away deciding who wins each game because once they decide to involve themselves the referee won't dare go against what they decide. Shamelessly biased and almost makes you want to turn off the game.I think at this point VAR is judged not on accuracy but what teams that it favours as on a weekly basis it does seem to be aimed at a particular calibre of team. It's hard to have a real conversation until it no longer feels a one way system.
I dont quite get what a review will do, other than maybe getting an apology, and say they made errors etc and it wont happen again, to it happening again as we all know it willPGMOL accepts VAR decisions at Chelsea & Newcastle were wrong
Referees' body PGMOL has effectively accepted controversial VAR decisions made at Chelsea and Newcastle were wrong and will co-operate with a Premier League review of the incidents.www.bbc.co.uk
That’s codswallop. Never a foul in a million years. Goalkeeper is grazed and then feigns injury as he is miles away from the ball with no chance in hell of saving the shot.The grumbles about the west ham disallowed goal I don't agree with. The keeper was caught by bowen off the ball albeit accidently, but the keeper was caught and then unable to get up to defend his goal. There were 4 seconds between the time it took from bowens contact with the keeper and the ball going in the net. Mendy could have gotten up and had a chance to defend the shot had he not been impeded by Bowen. Therefore it has to be disallowed and a foul given. Correct decision.
The clear and obvious thing is a prime example of why it can never work in a way that doesn’t seem to benefit one team over another.What annoys me is not one single manager yet has asked why its not being used for just "clear and obvious" errors as thats what it was sold as to be voted in by the 20 PL clubs.
They have to remove clear and obvious from the criteria, that call was wrong and the point shouldn't be to decide how wrong. It's how you get VVD not getting red, because the VAR decided it wasn't wrong enough.Clear and obvious?
It took them 5 minutes to find something wrong.
The players should just walk off. It's a disgrace.
I blame inept refereeing. Players wouldn't dive if officials weren't intent on rewarding players with soft free kicks and penaltiesOne issue is English football went from being one of the most honest leagues into a cesspit of cheating. Some would blame the influence of foreign players and coaches… and they’d be right!
NahThey have to remove clear and obvious from the criteria, that call was wrong and the point shouldn't be to decide how wrong. It's how you get VVD not getting red, because the VAR decided it wasn't wrong enough.
The way to fix this is make it challenge based. Each team gets to challenge one call and keeps it if they're right. At least then it is strategy and it isn't going to come in on every little thing.
But it still only works if the reviews are always honest.
You need to have some provision for fixing bad calls imo. The other argument is simply the rules don't matter.Nah
Lash it in the bin.
It's a farce and is suckimg the life out of the game.