Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Shareholders Association force EGM

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think Earl is interested in football at all, and he only did that to help a skint old friend to save his club. In return he asked for a stake in the club in the case that it gone under so he could get a good bulk of his investments back (at a time insolvency laws are not that shambolic) or when the club finds another owner he would get something out of it.

He, of course, see no reason to pour further money into the game.
 
I don't think Earl is interested in football at all, and he only did that to help a skint old friend to save his club. In return he asked for a stake in the club in the case that it gone under so he could get a good bulk of his investments back (at a time insolvency laws are not that shambolic) or when the club finds another owner he would get something out of it.

He, of course, see no reason to pour further money into the game.

FURTHER?

He hasnt put money into the game or the club.
 
I don't think Earl is interested in football at all, and he only did that to help a skint old friend to save his club. In return he asked for a stake in the club in the case that it gone under so he could get a good bulk of his investments back (at a time insolvency laws are not that shambolic) or when the club finds another owner he would get something out of it.

He, of course, see no reason to pour further money into the game.

That's not true. If the club went under, he'd struggle to get any money back.

Ask the directors at Portsmouth and Rangers if they got their money back.
 
I think the agenda for this meeting is a bit lame. We already know what their answer is as to why they stopped the AGM's, it will have something to do with them interpreting repeated requests for EGM's as being an attempt to destabilise the club, and that they view the methods of the Blue Union as being underhanded.

The real questions should relate to the forthcoming massive increase in revenue and what it is going to be spent on? Unfortunately, they will say something like "We'd like to see that money go on the club, and not into the pockets of agents and players".

But such an answer really isn't satisfactory for a number of reasons. Firstly we want to know exactly WHERE the money will be spent, or exactly WHAT the money will be spent on, saying it is going to be spent 'on the club' really isn't good enough.

Secondly, we are a club plying its trade in the PREMIER LEAGUE, it's all well and good saying you don't want the money going into the pockets of players but that's what you have to do if you want to succeed in the PREMIER League, and it is what all the other ambitious clubs will be doing! If you want to stop paying players so much money then go and buy a club plying its trade in League 1!

I expect the sycophantic attendees at this meeting to lap up the 'We'd prefer the money to go on the club' utterly ambiguous excuse.
 
Earl sees Everton as part of his portfolio, an asset to make a quick buck on for minimum effort. Kenwright shouldn't have invited him anywhere near the club sadly. We've gained pretty much nothing from having him except an overdraft and Stallone turning up once at L4.
 

I think the agenda for this meeting is a bit lame. We already know what their answer is as to why they stopped the AGM's, it will have something to do with them interpreting repeated requests for EGM's as being an attempt to destabilise the club, and that they view the methods of the Blue Union as being underhanded.

The real questions should relate to the forthcoming massive increase in revenue and what it is going to be spent on? Unfortunately, they will say something like "We'd like to see that money go on the club, and not into the pockets of agents and players".

But such an answer really isn't satisfactory for a number of reasons. Firstly we want to know exactly WHERE the money will be spent, or exactly WHAT the money will be spent on, saying it is going to be spent 'on the club' really isn't good enough.

Secondly, we are a club plying its trade in the PREMIER LEAGUE, it's all well and good saying you don't want the money going into the pockets of players but that's what you have to do if you want to succeed in the PREMIER League, and it is what all the other ambitious clubs will be doing! If you want to stop paying players so much money then go and buy a club plying its trade in League 1!

I expect the sycophantic attendees at this meeting to lap up the 'We'd prefer the money to go on the club' utterly ambiguous excuse.

The Shareholders Association are, by their very nature, extremely conservative. As shown by them taking several years to finally have enough to force the issue. The questions on the agenda are fairly generic; hopefully this will enable a wider discussion.

It also always makes me laugh when the club slate the Blue Union's 'tactics' as underhand. The club can hardly talk; refusing to hold an AGM for 5 years, being unable to explain certain financial details in the accounts, having directors like Earl that are effectively silent partners who are doing nothing to help the club, and the mystery of who is the investor behind BCR Sports and Vibrac in the Cayman Islands that supplies the club with their loans would all seem to be far more pressing issues than one instance of an alleged taped conversation - which also revealed an extremely worrying lack of knowledge of how the club is run by majority shareholder and chairman Kenwright.

The club really have no room to talk from a moral high ground.
 
Earl sees Everton as part of his portfolio, an asset to make a quick buck on for minimum effort. Kenwright shouldn't have invited him anywhere near the club sadly. We've gained pretty much nothing from having him except an overdraft and Stallone turning up once at L4.

Spot on that, he hoped to make a few quid from DK project.

I have to laugh, when people say " at least Bill has not sold to the likes of Venkys or Portsmouth owners "

To combat it, I give them Robert Earl as exhibit A. He does not care one jot about us.
 
This shareholders association is going about this completely the wrong way. They should be trying to join forces with Bill Kenwright and the "others" to try and form a proper allegiance and help them in the 24 hour a day quest for investment and running the CLub better. At least if they get the board on their side it will give them more clout to say Rob Elstone is useless and to get rid of him etc

I dont think it is going to do the Club any good whatsoever and tell me if I am wrong but this is going to be one of the first occasions that Martinez meets the fans and what is he going to see there? A load of "fans" from the shareholders association ripping BK a new one. I am not at all BKs biggest fan I just personally feel the Shareholders Association could do more harm than good.
 
This shareholders association is going about this completely the wrong way. They should be trying to join forces with Bill Kenwright and the "others" to try and form a proper allegiance and help them in the 24 hour a day quest for investment and running the CLub better. At least if they get the board on their side it will give them more clout to say Rob Elstone is useless and to get rid of him etc

I dont think it is going to do the Club any good whatsoever and tell me if I am wrong but this is going to be one of the first occasions that Martinez meets the fans and what is he going to see there? A load of "fans" from the shareholders association ripping BK a new one. I am not at all BKs biggest fan I just personally feel the Shareholders Association could do more harm than good.

I doubt the white walkers will join up with us to be honest.
 
This shareholders association is going about this completely the wrong way. They should be trying to join forces with Bill Kenwright and the "others" to try and form a proper allegiance and help them in the 24 hour a day quest for investment and running the CLub better. At least if they get the board on their side it will give them more clout to say Rob Elstone is useless and to get rid of him etc

I dont think it is going to do the Club any good whatsoever and tell me if I am wrong but this is going to be one of the first occasions that Martinez meets the fans and what is he going to see there? A load of "fans" from the shareholders association ripping BK a new one. I am not at all BKs biggest fan I just personally feel the Shareholders Association could do more harm than good.

What an absolute load of rubbish. How are the Shareholders going about this the wrong way? For the last 5 years they have politely, repeatedly requested an AGM with the club so that they could 'get onside' with the club and discuss their concerns. The club point-blank refused. The EGM was the only legal option left to the shareholders. Why should the shareholders help the club find new investors? That's not their job - thats the club's job to employ the same financial professionals that helped to sell Chelsea and Man City and other clubs, that's also the club's responsibility to attach a correct pricetag to the majority shareholding of the club to attract a willing buyer.

How dare anyone even think of slating the Shareholders Association. They've been more than patient. They've kept quiet for 5 years whilst others have publicly agitated. The club is not being done 'any good' by the current board's actions:

- plotting against the fans, we've had two consecutive 'director of communications' leave the club under a cloud in the past 2 years alone;
- the badge fiasco that 23000+ protested against by signing a petition against it;
- the continued sell-to-buy policy of key players;
- the collapse of the Kirkby stadium project and the Everton Place building plans;
- the departure of the club's manager and the club's inability to tie him down to a contract extension so that we at least got compensation for him;
- the complete absence of the 2nd largest majority shareholder in the club, from attending any Everton games and showing any interest in the club;
- the clubs inability to purchase their own training ground, and inability to take out a 25 year, £12m loan to pay for it (but a cash strapped city council can);
- the continued lack of investors found;
- the management of the club's debt of £44m;
- the complete lack of a plan for the way foward.

All of these are just things that have happened in the last 5 years since the last AGM was held.

Martinez won't be at the meeting, he's working for ESPN. But if he was, it would be a blessing as he would see our full problems for what they are - not some fake homogenised image of the club that everything is fine. It isn't. We're £44m in debt, with no assets bar the playing staff left and running out of assets to sell to maintain our position.

I suggest people learn a lot more about the Everton Shareholders Association before they start slating them for calling an EGM.

http://www.efcsa.org/category/news-articles/

One such article from May 7th this year:

Imminent Action on Everton FC EGM

As our members will know, the Everton FC Shareholders’ Association have been seeking the re-introduction of the Company Annual General Meetings at the club for some time. Our members, all of them both supporters and shareholders, have instructed the Executive Committee to pursue this matter on their behalf at each of the last two Association AGMs.

Following the democratically expressed wishes of our members, we have pursued this matter with the Board of Directors and Chief Executive of Everton. During the last two years we have taken a twin track approach as it has always been our preferred option that the Directors recognise the strong feeling of their shareholders on this matter and take the initiative to re-instate the AGM.

Consequently we have repeatedly put forth the argument that doing so would increase transparency at the club, offer the Board of Directors the opportunity to demonstrate their effective management of the company, and provide an opportunity for constructive engagement and exchange of ideas between the Directors and management on one side and the clubs shareholders and fans on the other.


However, in the event that the Directors remained unwilling to engage in this minimal show of transparency and good corporate governance, our only other option was to ask for the backing of enough shareholders to force the Directors to call an Extraordinary General Meeting against their will. So in concert with our appeals to the Board, and without ever giving up hope they would bow to the wishes of their shareholders, we took the steps to prepare such a petition and seek the support of our fellow shareholders.

We are therefore very disappointed to announce that we have failed to convince the Board of Directors to voluntarily convene a General Meeting and will soon notify the Company Secretary of the Everton Football Club Company Limited that we have secured the necessary mandate from the shareholders and require that the Club proceed forthwith to convene a General Meeting.

That says it all. They gave the club every chance and desperately want to work with them. And the club simply didn't want to know.
 
Last edited:

Spot on that, he hoped to make a few quid from DK project.

I have to laugh, when people say " at least Bill has not sold to the likes of Venkys or Portsmouth owners "

To combat it, I give them Robert Earl as exhibit A. He does not care one jot about us.

Beg to differ, I believe he cares that he is getting a generous return from the club via his 'vehicle' in the BVI.

The only reason he is involved in the club is as a profiting guarantor.
 
i dont understand why the club didnt have something like a yearly AGM instead of at the behest of pissed off fans and get rid of them altogether. Then again, that may mean they would have to answer questions instead of deflecting them away.
 
i dont understand why the club didnt have something like a yearly AGM instead of at the behest of pissed off fans and get rid of them altogether. Then again, that may mean they would have to answer questions instead of deflecting them away.

You answered your own question.
 
I'm hoping someone drops their kex shouting at the board "this is what we're missing - BALLS!!!".

Then pisses in the trifle.
 
This season could be the one that gets the board close to leaving should RM **** up David moyes the shield is no longer there
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top