Should Martinez be sacked? (Post-Stoke poll)

Should Martinez be sacked?

  • Yes

    Votes: 121 20.3%

  • No

    Votes: 475 79.7%
  • Total voters
    596
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
cronullasharks said:
And it looks like a lot of people in that 70% would vote differently in a matter of 2 or 3 games if nothing changes
Click to expand...
I wouldn't change anything until the end of the season or we look like we would be relegated. However if things don't dramatically improve I'm not sure about giving him the summer transfer window although I would support him in this one if he can bring Del back.
 

MoutsGoat said:
Tb9NgEW.png
Click to expand...

Net is spelt 'Net' not 'Nett'
 
banno said:
Not uptight at all chilled as can be. I am trying to stop you having depression or ulcers from your unhealthy hatred of Martinez. I am all for opinions and concede we are in a bad run but it is you who needs to take a chill pill and allow Martinez ,TIME' before binning him as a [Poor language removed] clueless manager. FFS he has only been here 5 minutes and now he is the anti-Christ the way you are talking. Think you just need to calm it a notch instead of trying to convince everyone that he is the worst manager since Mike Walker. Tell me a manager that has not made bad decisions (in hindsight) in the history of football and I will freely let you [Poor language removed] our new manager as much as you like without reply.
Click to expand...
banno said:
Not uptight at all chilled as can be. I am trying to stop you having depression or ulcers from your unhealthy hatred of Martinez. I am all for opinions and concede we are in a bad run but it is you who needs to take a chill pill and allow Martinez ,TIME' before binning him as a [Poor language removed] clueless manager. FFS he has only been here 5 minutes and now he is the anti-Christ the way you are talking. Think you just need to calm it a notch instead of trying to convince everyone that he is the worst manager since Mike Walker. Tell me a manager that has not made bad decisions (in hindsight) in the history of football and I will freely let you [Poor language removed] our new manager as much as you like without reply.
Click to expand...
 

No, but I'm starting to wonder...Literally nothing changes from game to game, and we look so toothless it's pathetic. Something's got to give. Not ready to say it's the manager yet, but I'm getting itchy.
 

Adversus said:
Who has spent that except Utd.

Liverpool had a net spend of around 20m
Chelsea probably where in profit.
Tottenham haven't spent much net in years.
Southampton where also in profit
etc
Arsenal and City are perhaps the only other two that spent more than 50m
Click to expand...


If you are capable of spending 75m-100m per season (Like Chelsea, City, Man Utd, Spurs, Liverpool) then over the seasons you will have grounds to make your net spend minimal as most do. Its football business....wheeling and dealing....but they are clubs that could afford that speculation to accumulate.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top