How is it biased? 30k a week is 15 mill over a year - 60 mill over a 4 year contract - that money comes from somewhere.
We did mate, we lost Neville, De Hammer, Mucha, Fellaini and Vic (5). But then took on (7) Kone, Alcaraz, McCarthy, Barry, Lukaku, Robles, Deulofeu.
Which is the point really, the club could well afford transfer fees, its the wages that are the problem, the need to sell Jela and Heitinga is more freeing up the wages then it is about transfer fees - that why people doing net spends on tranfer fees are only wrecking there own heads. As far as im aware we're reasonably good payers in the PL when it comes to wages.
Transfer fees are a bit of irrelvency in this day and age, certainly a aspect of a transfer, but not the major contributor to the actual cost of taking on a new player. Which is more the reason why you hear of players needing to go before others need to come in, rather then clubs needsing the fee, they need the wage - circa Jela and Keitings - id say both combined are north of 100k a week in wages.
It like the total liability figure thats trotted out, its not a fair reflection on the true financial situation.
Not defending the board or anything here - because we should be better then we are - just trying to be accurate.
30k a week is about 1.5 mil mate not 15m per year