Summer 2018 Transfer Window

Status
Not open for further replies.

Buy backs are essentially loan deals.

The selling club as proved with Barca and real with del and morata buy the player back simply to sell them on. Real paid 35? And sold for 70

So any buy back similar is us loaning the lad until he is good enough for Barca to make a profit on him.
 

Buy backs are essentially loan deals.

The selling club as proved with Barca and real with del and morata buy the player back simply to sell them on. Real paid 35? And sold for 70

So any buy back similar is us loaning the lad until he is good enough for Barca to make a profit on him.

Didn't Fabregas have a buy-back, and he was at Arsenal six or seven years.
 
Buy backs are essentially loan deals.

The selling club as proved with Barca and real with del and morata buy the player back simply to sell them on. Real paid 35? And sold for 70

So any buy back similar is us loaning the lad until he is good enough for Barca to make a profit on him.

You normally pay a loan fee, you certainly don’t make a profit on them so it’s not really like a loan deal.
 
Buy backs are essentially loan deals.

The selling club as proved with Barca and real with del and morata buy the player back simply to sell them on. Real paid 35? And sold for 70

So any buy back similar is us loaning the lad until he is good enough for Barca to make a profit on him.

Not got a problem with thqt to be honest.
If its the only way to get the player then it has to be done
 
Thats just it, hardly anybody plays Wingers as such these days, so when I say Wingers, I mean Sane, Sterling, Hazard, Salah.

Wingers is just easier to type than Wide Attacking Midfielder/Striker.

This exactly really, it's all about the width from the full backs allowing the "wingers" to cut in nowadays.

Personally for me if you're starting position is on the wing you're a winger. I only like to use the other terms when talking more indept about tactics and players role in the team.
 
Last edited:

I wouldn’t turn down any option to take Mina, if that includes a buy-back or loan so be it, particularly in the context of a big spend on Richarlison.

It would show creativity and flexibility to bring him here and that’s what I’m looking for from Brands. A player that’s wanted and makes us stronger even for a year or two only is better than not at all.
 
I wouldn’t turn down any option to take Mina, if that includes a buy-back or loan so be it, particularly in the context of a big spend on Richarlison.

It would show creativity and flexibility to bring him here and that’s what I’m looking for from Brands. A player that’s wanted and makes us stronger even for a year or two only is better than not at all.

The thing is, if hes any good Barca will take him back, if there wasnt a buyback you would think the fee would be dearer, so its more of a gamble, but either way, if hes any good its not like hes gonna stay here either way.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top