Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Summer Transfer Window 2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
Imagine replacing Lukaku with Vardy.

We'd actually win more games away from home , he's also actually much more suited to Koemans pressing style.

Shame he's a bad racist bell, 30 already and infinitely a dislikeable ratfaced weasel.

Pure footy terms we'd end up 50-60m in profit, with not that much of a downgrade short term on our main striker and arguably with one much better suited to the system.

6 of his 13 goals came against top four teams, scored in crucial games against sevilla and athletico.

Scored 9 last season against the current top 7 teams, over the past two seasons scored 5 past the rs.

Ignoring the fact he's a scrote, for a season or two it's arguable if we'd lose anything by lukaku leaving and vardy being there, plus 50-60m to bring in 2 younger strikers...
 
It's depressing because we're not even being seriously linked with anyone, considering half our team are still dead weight from Martinez era we drastically need to be getting business done so we can not only improve from this season but also compete competitively in the League, FA Cup, Carabao Cup AND the Europa League

Not to mention Barkley and Lukaku are both as likely to stay as they are to leave.

So it's not crying it's being realistic, we NEED to get [Poor language removed] done sooner rather than later otherwise we'll end up signing another player on loan from a mid table team who can't even get in their first team squad and panic bidding £30mil on an average at best midfielder only to be beaten to signing him by Tottenham on deadline day
Window isn't open yet and does shut to August, that's 3 months, calm down
 

Which I think is exactly why Walsh was brought in. While we would love to and might shoot to bring in big signings, we realize that we have to be better at finding good players than others have to be. Having Walsh find gems and Koeman wanting players now are not exclusive to eachother. His job is to find the Kante's. You can find players who the top 6 have just off of their radar, but who play to a top 4 level in their first year. The type of player who the top clubs consider europa league material and not CL, but who is actually underrated is both the type of player we want to bring in, and would be willing to come.

Walsh wasnt just brought in to find 3 mill players who play like they are worth 10 mill, he was also brought in to find 15 mill players who play like they are worth 40.

Look at how much of an increase in value players such as Kante, VVD, Dele Alli, Payet, Mane saw in just a season. There are more of them out there, but we just dont know who they are yet. Either Walsh is better than others at his job, or he is not, we obviously believe he is, and if thats the case we should unearth some of them.

Some sense.

Spurs are yet again the model to follow here. We need the type of Alli signings, but also have to attract some similar to Eriksen and find that type of player this summer. Clearly, Eriksen didn't demand UCL football as an all or nothing as Spurs were in the Europa League the season he joined. They were also attracting players of the ilk of Luka Modric when he was still home-based and not quite attracting the levels of attention he subsequently earned. Van der Waart was another example of a good signing at the right time.

This is surely why Walsh has been brought to the club. I think Champions League is overstated in its immediate importance to players. They all want to be sold an idea of where a club is going, where things are headed over the next 2-3 years. Clearly not only have Spurs sold themselves well but they have also delivered if they promised UCL football to anybody over the course of a contract. That adds hugely to credibility now and they should reap the rewards.

We are told we have the finances, and we should even without any largesse from Moshiri, be able to compete in the sort of targeted market we should be fishing in.

The unknown is obviously what sort of narrative we are giving to players and agents. The amount of rejections last summer was obviously a concern, but a year on with UEL football and definitive stadium plans, surely we are better placed. Comparisons with Man City are futile as their takeover was a game-changer overnight, and even then they signed quite a bit of dross at inflated prices.

It isn't that we can't offer UCL football, its what players/agents, and the wider footballing world are hearing in between the lines when Everton are mentioned. Are we a club on the up, bullish, and with bold and ambitions plans? If so, that is a tremendously good sell if we can offer decent wages to boot, and spend a little over the odds if required.

If that doesn't stack up, and we are seen as happy to tread water with a finish anywhere in the top six seen as the holy grail, then our attractiveness is deservedly limited to players of similar levels of quality and ambition.
 
We'd actually win more games away from home , he's also actually much more suited to Koemans pressing style.

Shame he's a bad racist bell, 30 already and infinitely a dislikeable ratfaced weasel.

Pure footy terms we'd end up 50-60m in profit, with not that much of a downgrade short term on our main striker and arguably with one much better suited to the system.

6 of his 13 goals came against top four teams, scored in crucial games against sevilla and athletico.

Scored 9 last season against the current top 7 teams, over the past two seasons scored 5 past the rs.

Ignoring the fact he's a scrote, for a season or two it's arguable if we'd lose anything by lukaku leaving and vardy being there, plus 50-60m to bring in 2 younger strikers...


WINNING POST OF THE DAY

TALKS SENSE NOT CODSWALLOP
 

I know its probably tosh but Vardy replacing Lukaku for a season or 2 and being 50-60 million in profit to invest in another young striker and the squad wouldn't be bad business at all.
 
Laughing at the fact that some of you don't want last years prem second highest scorer who was subject to a 20mil + bid from Wenger, based on his annoying face! We'd probably turn down Pepe, Kane and Costa based on the same understanding.

How did we ever sign Beardo?
To the players and staff at lfc he was fondly known as"quasi"
 
We'd actually win more games away from home , he's also actually much more suited to Koemans pressing style.

Shame he's a bad racist bell, 30 already and infinitely a dislikeable ratfaced weasel.

Pure footy terms we'd end up 50-60m in profit, with not that much of a downgrade short term on our main striker and arguably with one much better suited to the system.

6 of his 13 goals came against top four teams, scored in crucial games against sevilla and athletico.

Scored 9 last season against the current top 7 teams, over the past two seasons scored 5 past the rs.

Ignoring the fact he's a scrote, for a season or two it's arguable if we'd lose anything by lukaku leaving and vardy being there, plus 50-60m to bring in 2 younger strikers...

Given Walsh's track record of unearthing value picks and younger players blowing big money on a player for the here and now isn't as big a problem as it was say 3-4 years ago. I'm not massively keen on Vardy for reason's you've mentioned but he is very effective and suits what Koeman is looking for. Essentially he is Shane Long who can finish.
 
Vardy has been found out this season. Long ball, run, goal just doesn't work anymore.

Look at how many he scored this season compared with the season they won the league.

One dimensional. and a tit.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top