Summer Transfer Window 2017

[Moomin]

Why does he need a work permit?

Because we dont accept the people of Croatia to have full worker rights of the EU until July next year.

He needs a work permit.

 

[Moomin]

There should be no need for a work permit as Croatia are a member state of the EU.
Whilst Britain is a member of the EU, he shouldn't need one.

July 2018 they will have full EU worker rights in the UK.

 

[devogue]

Because we dont accept the people of Croatia to have full worker rights of the EU until July next year.

He needs a work permit.

Thx. Reckon this transfer will still happen.


Gibson
Jiminez
Vlasic

 

[Kever10]

That... wasn't an opinion. That was maths.

We may have spent over £100m on three players, but that is offset by money coming in for others. So we haven't really spent it. If Barkley goes I believe we're literally back to zero, despite TV money, whereas the likes of West Brom have thus far spent £40m and have consistently spent over many seasons.

As of this moment, we've spent around £30m with a likely outgoing of £30m to nullify it. That's not an opinion.

Well 1st of all, weve spent

Pickford - £30m
Klaassen - £25m
Keane - £30m
Onyekuru - £7m
Sandro - £5m
Bowler - £4m
Martina - Free
Gibson - £6m
Sigurdsson - £45m
= £152m

Sold

Lukaku - £90m + Rooney
Cleverly - £8m
Deulofeu - £10m
McGeady - £1m
Barry - undisclosed, let's say £1m
Kone - Free
McAleny - Free

=£110

That makes £42m spend...

Barkley looks like he will probably go, maybe we get £30m max, but we are still to sign Vlasic (£8m) and still hopeful of signing a striker (you would imagine £30m given the current going rate) and potentially a CB (let's be conservative and say £15m)...

At the end of the window, even with Barkley gone, that would still mean a spend of £65m if all the maybes become reality. Hardly breaking even, and that's before you factor in wages.

And just because it's a bug bear of mine anyway, why would breaking even, or God forbid, a negative net spend, be a bad thing anyway? If you can improve the team without spending fortunes each year, surely that is the thing to do?

Net spend means absolutely nothing, unless the team is not improved with your dealings.

 

[Efcjake]

Lads get some Sawyer screenshots up if you're gonna tease like this.

....Hope we get a striker in....

 

[trueblue10]

Probably will end up signing someone that hasn't been mentioned yet.

Is there anyone that hasn't been mentioned?

 

[TheWinslowBoy]

July 2018 they will have full EU worker rights in the UK.

Everton literally just have to sponsor his application ie say he's got a job to come to.

Just a formality.

 

[TyphooToffee]

https://www.footballtransfertavern....ticket-everton-fans-react-to-surprise-rumour/

Here is something to amuse everyone for a minute.

Just about to watch the highlights of the rs at Watford to get a look at Okaka

 

[Lee Smith]

I seem to have stumbled into the Natalie Sawyer's Tittie thread. Pics please as I haven't got SSN here at the moment and I need to be able to make an informed decision on if they've changed much since I last reviewed them.

 

[Deleted member 28206]

 

[Tubey]

Well 1st of all, weve spent

Pickford - £30m
Klaassen - £25m
Keane - £30m
Onyekuru - £7m
Sandro - £5m
Bowler - £4m
Martina - Free
Gibson - £6m
Sigurdsson - £45m
= £152m

Sold

Lukaku - £90m + Rooney
Cleverly - £8m
Deulofeu - £10m
McGeady - £1m
Barry - undisclosed, let's say £1m
Kone - Free
McAleny - Free

=£110

That makes £42m spend...

Barkley looks like he will probably go, maybe we get £30m max, but we are still to sign Vlasic (£8m) and still hopeful of signing a striker (you would imagine £30m given the current going rate) and potentially a CB (let's be conservative and say £15m)...

At the end of the window, even with Barkley gone, that would still mean a spend of £65m if all the maybes become reality. Hardly breaking even, and that's before you factor in wages.

And just because it's a bug bear of mine anyway, why would breaking even, or God forbid, a negative net spend, be a bad thing anyway? If you can improve the team without spending fortunes each year, surely that is the thing to do?

Net spend means absolutely nothing, unless the team is not improved with your dealings.

It'd be a bad thing because we are clearly in need of players in certain areas and we aren't spending to bring them in. Net spend indicates ambition - you can't be ambitious by constantly buying to sell and then selling to buy. Ambition means actual investment.

Last summer was poor, but I was willing to excuse it because Walsh was new in and Moshiri perhaps wanted to see the lie of the land and give time for a proper team to bring players in. However, if we leave this window having gutted our attack and not spent actual money to improve us, then that confirms Moshiri as something for me, and that is an upper class Kenwright - a sell to buy merchant with the ability to use an overdraft - and that would be entirely justified, given even counter-arguments like "oh but the stadium" are just plans on paper at this point.

 

[Osamabindiesel]

I hear the camera adds 2 cups

 

[TheWinslowBoy]

Definitely grown them.

Moving towards Nigella territory.

 

[Barnfred 55]

Less of this please or we will end up offending every feminist

Guilty as charged m'lord.

 

[toffee matt]

Wish Sky would bring Kate Abdo back.