Surely it would be BLAMM-On?
BLAMM-NO
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Surely it would be BLAMM-On?
If Im a weasel who rats out his sources, can they be put on the weaseling index instead, or is that a ferret thing to do? I dont want to badger you about it or anything, but its an important question and I otter know the answer.Not long now.
If Im a weasel who rats out his sources, can they be put on the weaseling index instead, or is that a ferret thing to do? I dont want to badger you about it or anything, but its an important question and I otter know the answer.
Its impossible to answer. A bog standard PL striker would cost that much. DCL cost £1m, and you never know, might net 10 to 15 next season.
Kane cost Spurs £0.00. Neymar cost PSG heavens only knows. Henri cost Arsenal £500,000.
My question is about expectations. I don’t think it’s unreasonable really.
Do you mean Henry? Because he cost Arsenal 11milIts impossible to answer. A bog standard PL striker would cost that much. DCL cost £1m, and you never know, might net 10 to 15 next season.
Kane cost Spurs £0.00. Neymar cost PSG heavens only knows. Henri cost Arsenal £500,000.
Do you mean Henry? Because he cost Arsenal 11mil
Was his first name henri?Think he means Anelka
Do you mean Henry? Because he cost Arsenal 11mil
In Ireland the farmers would play GAA not FootballBut its still a daft question. Like what would you expect from a young Right Back from a farmers league in Ireland for £60,000?
Aint the price, its the player.
Well no, it’s not a daft question. The answer gives me an idea of how someone values the risk. Especially in the context of what he’s said previously. I asked because I wanted to get a feel for the posters approach.But its still a daft question. Like what would you expect from a young Right Back from a farmers league in Ireland for £60,000?
Aint the price, its the player.
Well no, it’s not a daft question. The answer gives me an idea of how someone values the risk. Especially in the context of what he’s said previously. I asked because I wanted to get a feel for the posters approach.
For instance, I think 5-10 goals a season is a reasonable return for a £20m striker.
I’d pay over £40m for a 10-15 goal striker and not be disappointed.
Anything north of 15 goals and it’d be closer to £60.
Now none of that suggests you can’t get any of those things for less money. But it gives an indication of what my expectations would be. Which was my question.
About 5, but the whole point of buying a player like Kean is the belief that he will become a better player than that over time, but that could take 2-3 years. It might happen straight away and then we look very smart. But we have to be prepared and realisticYou seem to be answering a completely different question.
All I’m asking is ‘how many goals a season would you expect from a £20m striker?’
Very shrewdIf Im a weasel who rats out his sources, can they be put on the weaseling index instead, or is that a ferret thing to do? I dont want to badger you about it or anything, but its an important question and I otter know the answer.
You won’t get a proven one for that price. £20m gets you Solanke , £20m gets you a kid with potential or an older experienced striker 30 plus.Can you name all the top young strikers we can sign for £20m then please?