There’s a few different aspects to that.Well no, it’s not a daft question. The answer gives me an idea of how someone values the risk. Especially in the context of what he’s said previously. I asked because I wanted to get a feel for the posters approach.
For instance, I think 5-10 goals a season is a reasonable return for a £20m striker.
I’d pay over £40m for a 10-15 goal striker and not be disappointed.
Anything north of 15 goals and it’d be closer to £60.
Now none of that suggests you can’t get any of those things for less money. But it gives an indication of what my expectations would be. Which was my question.
I think it depends whether you’re talking reasonable expectation or minimum expectation. It’s reasonable to expect about 10 goals from a £20m striker in the current market, but probably not reasonable to demand 10 as a minimum.
That brings me to the 2nd point, which is your parameters are too big. Without wanting to state the obvious, 10 is literally twice as many as 5, there’s an enormous difference between a striker scoring 5 and 10 and I wouldn’t put them in the same price bracket at all.
It depends on the team you play for of course, but with our other attacking players around them I would honestly back Sambou, hornby, Simms etc to get 5 goals in 38 games, and they ain’t £20m players.