So you do now?
Yes because he’s here and he has not looked arsed once on the pitch. If Vlasic comes back, stays & does the same I’ll call him a cryarse too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you do now?
I couldn't disagree more. To me Lookman looks almost too desperate to make an impression on the few chances he gets. The only time he didn't look happy was that one friendly where he still wanted off and he only came on with 5 minutes left.Yes because he’s here and he has not looked arsed once on the pitch. If Vlasic comes back, stays & does the same I’ll call him a cryarse too.
Too far ladYou wouldn't be sorry???
Id happily dance at a KKK gathering dressed as Cunta Kinte.
Probably correct and a quite measured approach like this is what is needed. I think what we actually need more than anything is time for Silva to do his job and further instill more of the good stuff that we have seen towards the end of this season.To be honest, i can think of worse things then having a bench of Henry, Ade, Vlasic, Davies, Zouma/Yerry, Virgina next season.
That is players we already own, the first team picks itself at the moment, Zouma, Andre - are hopes we can snag, else wise im not sure we need much more then a forward, if we want or chose to develop the players i mention.
The real emphasis needs to be on rationlising the squad instead of ins, im not sure we need loads to develop.
I wouldn't say it's a conspiracy, if it is then Silva is in on it as well. Most are basing their opinions on what they have seen with their own eyes backed up with the managers comments.Proper don't get the hate and conspiracy theories with Lookman. Get a grip fellas.
What did he say?I wouldn't say it's a conspiracy, if it is then Silva is in on it as well. Most are basing their opinions on what they have seen with their own eyes backed up with the managers comments.
??Wider
I wouldn't say it's a conspiracy, if it is then Silva is in on it as well. Most are basing their opinions on what they have seen with their own eyes backed up with the managers comments.
He said Lookman didnt show enough desire in training and that he hadnt progressed like Marco hoped he would. Those are not positive remarks about a young player and they back up every «he seems lazy or uninteressted» comment on here.What did he say?
I'd keep Lookman over Walcott if I had to choose.
But it's not though, that's the thing, in the first year he was here he stormed out of training twice because he found out he was'nt in the match day squad. Also when he first went to RBL he started moaning there because he felt he was'nt getting as much time as he wanted and was told to 'shut up and wait his turn' and he ended up playing quite well. Silva has also stated that he was not getting picked at one point due to the poor showing he was putting in at training. No doubting he has some talent (i don't quite think it's as much as some on here think) but he does seem to be a bit moody at times.All Silva has said (once, in March time) was that Lookman needed to show more in training.
Since then Lookman has come on in pretty much every game. In the last two games he's done very well. Was a few inches off scoring a banger v Burnley.
If he goes, he goes. It'd be a shame cause he's quite clearly a talent. But all this talk that he's definitely a sulker, definitely got an attitude problem etc. It's nonsense.
That's not even controversial so I will be: I'd keep him over Bernard if I had to choose one.I'd keep Lookman over Walcott if I had to choose.