£150m for Salah (imo) is hugely inflatedDon't recall many inflated fees to over there personally, didn't pay attention to all, but most fees were a fair reflection of their talent I thought.
Just like this 1.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
£150m for Salah (imo) is hugely inflatedDon't recall many inflated fees to over there personally, didn't pay attention to all, but most fees were a fair reflection of their talent I thought.
Just like this 1.
Well considering it was turned down, it seems it wasn't enough.£150m for Salah (imo) is hugely inflated
Yeh, I know but the fact they were willing to pay that and even higher is mentalWell considering it was turned down, it seems it wasn't enough.
But I agree.
Been trying to tell you all summer that no one will pay money for our crappers Zat.
£150m for Salah (imo) is hugely inflated
Very fair point actuallyPremier Muslim player - literally the Muslim superstar - would be a huge draw for KSA league & great for sponsorships and revenues and all that.
For footy levels alone it’s like 2x his value - probably more like 3x tbh
Don't recall many inflated fees to over there personally, didn't pay attention to all, but most fees were a fair reflection of their talent I thought.
Just like this 1.
Hendo was 12m.Fabinho for £40m, Henderson for £30m, Mitrovic £50m, Saint-Maximin £25m, Koulibaly £30m.
On what planet is Salah only worth £50m in today's market? Ludicrous.Premier Muslim player - literally the Muslim superstar - would be a huge draw for KSA league & great for sponsorships and revenues and all that.
For footy levels alone it’s like 2x his value - probably more like 3x tbh
Hendo was 12m.
The only other 1 that seems stupid is Mitro.
I think the others are fair market value.
On what planet is Salah only worth £50m in today's market? Ludicrous.
The market dictates. Whether you or me think that £50m is preposterous for somebody who kicks a football about or not, it is what it is.
Chelsea have net spent more in 12 months than we have in 10 years and we're the ones being strangled by FFPDemo-economic analysis of player transfers (2014-2023) - CIES Football Observatory
This Monthly Report analyses the financial flows of football transfers on a global scale during the decade between 2014 and 2023. It presents the (...)football-observatory.com
Some interesting figures there regarding transfers.
CBA posting screenshots, but the highlights for me.
United have spent 1.4billion NET since 2014 on players.
Everton are 15th on the list with 392m, clearly the majority in the 2 or 3 years we spent money.
Benfica have made a player trading profit of 764million, which is just insane.
The 2nd highest is Ajax with a mere 434m
No surprise that forwards account for nearly 50% of all money spent in the last Transfer window.
Goalkeepers
3.6%
Centre backs
15.5%
Full backs
10.2%
Midfielders
21.1%
Forwards
49.6%
Anyway, enjoy stat nerds, I know I did.
Heavy price to pay for an opinion that lolLooking at the evidence, you were fatally wrong.
It's not thoughHow much did mane go to Bayern for? That’s salads value