Just reading through this thread, its interesting to see that tories are generally speaking, just nastier people
Anyone who votes anything over than Labour is advocating a tory government and is therefore a beaut.
Actually on typing that I realise I don't believe it as even Labour is a crap option.
Just revolt. That's what we need.
no dont think soAny chance that any constituency in Liverpool won't vote red?
Aneurin Bevin called it a long time ago and it hasn't been bettered as a description since. The full quote:Just reading through this thread, its interesting to see that tories are generally speaking, just nastier people
No attempt at ethical or social seduction can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin.
I'm fully aware that Davek's saying that. I agree with him in his assessment of Blair's Labour Party as being divorced of any traditional left wing thinking. I'm equally aware that the statement "Anything that is not left wing is de facto right wing" is simplistic and fallacious - it completely ignores the centre ground of politics.No he isn't. You're not making sense at all, here. I mean, I can see what you're trying to say - but it is based on a massive misconception revolving around your own (rather idiosyncratic) opinion of what the phrase "a part of the right" means. Davek is saying that the LP of Blair was no longer "left wing" in any traditional interpretation of the phrase. Hence, a party of the right.
The "New Labour" experiment almost killed the values of the founders of the Labour Party.
Hearing about and seeing "Cool Britannia" and "Champagne Socialism" in action has only been confirmed by watching Mr & Mrs Blair (& now their children) trouser millions every year.
Whether they would be more electable with hard line socialist policies is highly debatable.